Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSMX vs NRGSX
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs NRGSX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
Price$10.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.81M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$61.89
Change+$0.30 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.33B
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSMX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSMX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.33B vs. ECSMX (155M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ECSMX: NRGSX (0.07) vs ECSMX (0.00). ECSMX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ECSMX (24 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ECSMX (2.11) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ECSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECSMX: NRGSX (0) vs ECSMX (1000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.10 vs. ECSMX (-17.09). ECSMX return over 5 years is better than : -5.12 vs. NRGSX (-9.86).
| ECSMX | NRGSX | ECSMX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.74 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.74 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.385 | -5.754 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 8.33B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.09 | -16.10 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.00 | -3.70 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.12 | -9.86 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.52 | 4.12 | -498% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement