Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSMX vs NRGSX
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs NRGSX
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSMX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSMX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.49B vs. ECSMX (123M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ECSMX: NRGSX (0.47) vs ECSMX (0.00). ECSMX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ECSMX (24 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ECSMX (2.14) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ECSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECSMX: NRGSX (0) vs ECSMX (1000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.03 vs. ECSMX (-7.16). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -20.50 vs. ECSMX (-24.03).
| ECSMX | NRGSX | ECSMX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.74 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.74 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.491 | 9.900 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 123M | 7.49B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -3.03 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.60 | 1.88 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.03 | -20.50 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.22 | 14.17 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement