Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSMX vs NRGSX
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs NRGSX
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSMX vs. NRGSX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSMX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. ECSMX (132M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ECSMX: NRGSX (0.45) vs ECSMX (0.00). ECSMX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ECSMX (24 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ECSMX (2.14) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ECSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECSMX: NRGSX (0) vs ECSMX (1000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.20 vs. ECSMX (-7.23). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -18.93 vs. ECSMX (-20.76).
| ECSMX | NRGSX | ECSMX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.74 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.74 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | 16.543 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 7.39B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.23 | -1.20 | 601% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.09 | 7.14 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.76 | -18.93 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.28 | 12.86 | -72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers