Ad is loading...
ECSQX vs PCLNX
ECSQX vs PCLNX Comparison
Open Charts ECSQX vs PCLNX
Embark Commodity Strategy Retirement
Price$10.58
Change-$0.08 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I-3
Price$6.23
Change-$0.07 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
ECSQX vs PCLNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLNX has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. ECSQX (3.08B). PCLNX pays higher dividends than ECSQX: PCLNX (8.16) vs ECSQX (5.52). ECSQX was incepted earlier than PCLNX: ECSQX (1 year) vs PCLNX (7 years). PCLNX (1.20) is less costly to investors than ECSQX (0.73). PCLNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 224.00 vs. ECSQX (34.00). ECSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLNX: ECSQX (0) vs PCLNX (1000000). ECSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.54 vs. PCLNX (-4.51).
| ECSQX | PCLNX | ECSQX / PCLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.98 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.20 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.965 | -1.962 | -304% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 4.68B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.52 | 8.16 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.54 | -4.51 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | -2.39 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 193.79 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...