Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSQX vs PCLNX
ECSQX vs PCLNX Comparison
Open Charts ECSQX vs PCLNX
Embark Commodity Strategy Retirement
Price$11.02
Change+$0.19 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.14B
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I-3
Price$6.65
Change+$0.16 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.22B
ECSQX vs PCLNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLNX has more cash in the bank: 4.22B vs. ECSQX (3.14B). PCLNX pays higher dividends than ECSQX: PCLNX (8.84) vs ECSQX (5.75). ECSQX was incepted earlier than PCLNX: ECSQX (1 year) vs PCLNX (7 years). PCLNX (1.20) is less costly to investors than ECSQX (0.73). PCLNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 224.00 vs. ECSQX (34.00). ECSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLNX: ECSQX (0) vs PCLNX (1000000). ECSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.39 vs. PCLNX (0.41).
| ECSQX | PCLNX | ECSQX / PCLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.98 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.20 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.544 | 1.712 | 557% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.14B | 4.22B | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.75 | 8.84 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.39 | 0.41 | 2,262% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | -2.58 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 149.78 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement