Ad is loading...
ECSQX vs PCLPX
ECSQX vs PCLPX Comparison
Open Charts ECSQX vs PCLPX
Embark Commodity Strategy Retirement
Price$10.58
Change-$0.08 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I2
Price$6.25
Change-$0.07 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
ECSQX vs PCLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. ECSQX (3.08B). PCLPX pays higher dividends than ECSQX: PCLPX (8.18) vs ECSQX (5.52). ECSQX was incepted earlier than PCLPX: ECSQX (1 year) vs PCLPX (15 years). PCLPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than ECSQX (0.73). PCLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 224.00 vs. ECSQX (34.00). ECSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLPX: ECSQX (0) vs PCLPX (1000000). ECSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.54 vs. PCLPX (-4.60).
| ECSQX | PCLPX | ECSQX / PCLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.93 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.965 | -1.948 | -306% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 4.68B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.52 | 8.18 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.54 | -4.60 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | -2.28 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 193.57 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...