Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSQX vs PCLPX
ECSQX vs PCLPX Comparison
Open Charts ECSQX vs PCLPX
Embark Commodity Strategy Retirement
Price$10.80
Change+$0.05 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.12B
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I2
Price$6.57
Change+$0.11 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.22B
ECSQX vs PCLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.22B vs. ECSQX (3.12B). PCLPX pays higher dividends than ECSQX: PCLPX (8.84) vs ECSQX (5.75). ECSQX was incepted earlier than PCLPX: ECSQX (1 year) vs PCLPX (15 years). PCLPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than ECSQX (0.73). PCLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 224.00 vs. ECSQX (34.00). ECSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLPX: ECSQX (0) vs PCLPX (1000000). ECSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.81 vs. PCLPX (-0.27).
| ECSQX | PCLPX | ECSQX / PCLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.93 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.357 | 0.224 | 3,289% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 4.22B | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.75 | 8.84 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.81 | -0.27 | -2,932% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | -6.98 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 146.03 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement