Ad is loading...
ECTMX vs RMFCX
ECTMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECTMX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder C
Price$15.07
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets873.46M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
ECTMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECTMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECTMX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. ECTMX (873M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECTMX: RMFCX (1.34) vs ECTMX (0.75). ECTMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECTMX (31 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ECTMX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECTMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECTMX: RMFCX (250) vs ECTMX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. ECTMX (0.04). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. ECTMX (12.82).
| ECTMX | RMFCX | ECTMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.91 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.91 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.762 | -3.342 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 873M | 96.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.34 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.04 | 3.60 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.48 | 5.79 | -336% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.82 | 48.78 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.25 | 52.90 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...