EDC
Price
$85.51
Change
+$7.14 (+9.11%)
Updated
Jul 6, 12:48 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
163.27M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXL
Price
$204.84
Change
+$23.37 (+12.88%)
Updated
Jul 6, 01:14 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
21.28B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDC vs SOXL

EDC vs SOXL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) vs. Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL)

Key Takeaways

  • Both EDC and SOXL are Direxion-leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) targeting 300% of the daily performance of their respective benchmarks, making them high-risk instruments suited for short-term tactical use rather than long-term holding.
  • EDC provides amplified exposure to a broad basket of emerging-market equities across multiple sectors, while SOXL delivers concentrated 3x daily leverage to the semiconductor industry, resulting in materially different risk and return profiles.
  • SOXL carries a lower net expense ratio of 0.75% compared with 1.09% for EDC, offering a modest cost advantage that can compound over repeated trading cycles.
  • EDC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index through swaps and derivatives with limited underlying holdings, whereas SOXL seeks 3x the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index with direct exposure to approximately 30 semiconductor names.
  • Sector exposure diverges sharply: EDC allocates across technology, financials, consumer cyclicals, and other emerging-market industries, while SOXL maintains 100% technology-sector concentration in semiconductors.
  • Both products reset daily and exhibit elevated volatility; their performance is driven primarily by the underlying index direction, leverage mechanics, and compounding effects rather than static holdings.

Introduction

Investors seeking leveraged exposure to growth themes often compare EDC and SOXL because both are 3x daily bull ETFs from the same issuer yet target distinct segments of the global equity market. EDC offers broad emerging-markets amplification, while SOXL provides concentrated semiconductor leverage. These funds do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative tactical vehicles for investors with differing views on emerging-market breadth versus semiconductor-specific momentum. Understanding their structural differences helps clarify which strategy may align with particular market regimes.

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) Overview

EDC seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The fund employs swaps, derivatives, and cash equivalents rather than holding a large portfolio of individual stocks, resulting in approximately 17 holdings dominated by index swaps and treasury instruments. Expense ratio stands at 1.09%. Sector allocations within the underlying index typically emphasize technology (around 33%), financial services (around 21%), consumer cyclicals, and communication services. Top underlying index constituents include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Samsung Electronics, Tencent Holdings, SK Hynix, and Alibaba Group. The product is a passive, leveraged strategy with daily rebalancing and is designed for short-term trading horizons.

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) Overview

SOXL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. It achieves leverage through a combination of swaps, futures, and equity holdings, maintaining roughly 30–50 positions concentrated in semiconductor companies. Net expense ratio is 0.75%. Sector allocation is 100% technology, focused exclusively on semiconductors and related equipment. Prominent index constituents include Nvidia, Broadcom, Micron Technology, Advanced Micro Devices, and Applied Materials. Like EDC, the fund is a passive, leveraged vehicle with daily reset mechanics intended for brief holding periods.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader technology and growth-equity landscape. Semiconductors remain central to artificial-intelligence infrastructure, data-center expansion, and advanced electronics, creating persistent demand drivers. Emerging markets, meanwhile, benefit from manufacturing diversification, rising middle-class consumption, and technology adoption in Asia and Latin America, though they face headwinds from geopolitical tensions, currency fluctuations, and varying regulatory environments. Capital flows into semiconductor supply chains have been robust in recent market cycles, while emerging-market equity inflows have been more variable depending on global risk appetite and interest-rate expectations. Regulatory scrutiny of technology exports and supply-chain resilience continues to shape both themes.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, SOXL has tended to exhibit higher volatility tied to semiconductor earnings cycles and artificial-intelligence spending announcements, while EDC has reflected broader emerging-market sentiment influenced by commodity prices, regional monetary policy, and global trade dynamics. Sector rotation favoring technology has generally supported semiconductor exposure more consistently than diversified emerging-market baskets during periods of strong growth expectations. Both funds amplify daily moves, so relative positioning depends heavily on the prevailing direction of their underlying indices rather than static security selection. Liquidity remains strong for both products, supporting efficient entry and exit for tactical strategies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, concentrated exposure to a high-momentum semiconductor theme, and consistent sector tailwinds, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable relative positioning to SOXL within short-term leveraged frameworks, while recognizing that EDC offers valuable diversification across emerging markets for investors seeking broader geographic exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EDC vs. SOXL commentary
Jul 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDC is a Hold and SOXL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXL has more net assets: 21.3B vs. EDC (163M). SOXL has a higher annual dividend yield than EDC: SOXL (331.763) vs EDC (45.141). EDC was incepted earlier than SOXL: EDC (18 years) vs SOXL (16 years). SOXL (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than EDC (1.09). EDC has a higher turnover SOXL (250.00) vs SOXL (250.00).
EDCSOXLEDC / SOXL
Gain YTD45.141331.76314%
Net Assets163M21.3B1%
Total Expense Ratio1.090.75145%
Turnover347.00250.00139%
Yield1.200.0031,934%
Fund Existence18 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDCSOXL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGHIX46.391.11
+2.45%
Hartford Healthcare I
BAFLX28.440.41
+1.46%
Brown Advisory Global Leaders Instl
UBVTX84.711.11
+1.33%
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R3
MWMZX32.810.36
+1.11%
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Z
PRVRX14.600.14
+0.97%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val R

SOXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXL has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXL jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXL
1D Price
Change %
SOXL100%
-16.58%
ONTO - SOXL
79%
Closely correlated
-12.46%
MKSI - SOXL
78%
Closely correlated
-11.07%
ASX - SOXL
76%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
TSM - SOXL
75%
Closely correlated
-2.27%
STM - SOXL
69%
Closely correlated
-3.35%
More