EDC
Price
$85.12
Change
+$4.48 (+5.56%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
194.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXL
Price
$117.28
Change
+$10.54 (+9.87%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
20.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDC vs SOXL

EDC vs SOXL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) vs. Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL)

Key Takeaways

  • EDC provides 3x daily leveraged exposure to the broad MSCI Emerging Markets Index, offering diversified access across 24 emerging market countries, while SOXL delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the ICE Semiconductor Index, concentrating on the semiconductor sector.
  • Both ETFs employ derivative instruments such as swaps to achieve their leveraged objectives and are designed for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to compounding effects and high volatility.
  • EDC carries a higher net expense ratio of 1.09% compared to SOXL’s 0.75%, reflecting differences in underlying index complexity and operational costs.
  • EDC features broader geographic and sector diversification with notable allocations to financial services, technology, and consumer cyclicals across emerging economies, whereas SOXL maintains near-100% exposure to semiconductors and related technology firms.
  • Structural characteristics position EDC as a vehicle for amplified emerging markets beta and SOXL as a targeted amplifier of semiconductor industry momentum driven by technological cycles.
  • Both funds are non-diversified, use synthetic replication methods, and maintain liquidity through cash collateral and swap agreements, making them suitable primarily for sophisticated investors monitoring daily resets.

Introduction

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) represent distinct leveraged strategies within the exchange-traded fund landscape. They do not compete directly as substitutes but instead provide alternative routes to amplified equity exposure: one targeting broad emerging market growth and the other focusing on the high-growth semiconductor industry. Investors seeking tactical, short-term positions in global development themes or technology supply chains may evaluate these vehicles for their structural differences in index targeting, cost, and risk concentration. The comparison highlights how each ETF aligns with varying investor objectives around sector rotation and geographic allocation in evolving macroeconomic conditions.

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) Overview

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The fund utilizes swap agreements and other derivatives to achieve its leveraged objective, with primary exposure derived from instruments referencing the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF. It maintains a limited number of holdings centered on derivatives and cash equivalents for collateral purposes. The net expense ratio stands at 1.09%. As a passive, leveraged product from Direxion, EDC rebalances daily to maintain its target multiple and carries no active management overlay. Sector allocations reflect the underlying index’s composition, with meaningful weights in financial services, technology, and consumer cyclicals across emerging economies including Taiwan, South Korea, China, and India. The structure emphasizes synthetic replication rather than direct equity ownership.

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) Overview

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) targets daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the ICE Semiconductor Index. The ETF achieves its leverage through a portfolio of swap contracts on the index alongside cash and treasury instruments serving as collateral. Holdings consist primarily of derivatives and short-term fixed-income securities. The net expense ratio is 0.75%. SOXL operates as a passive leveraged vehicle with daily rebalancing to reset its exposure multiple. Allocations concentrate exclusively within the semiconductor and broader technology sectors, featuring major positions tied to companies such as those involved in memory, logic, and equipment manufacturing. The fund structure prioritizes synthetic exposure to capture amplified movements in the semiconductor supply chain without holding individual stocks directly in significant quantities.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The broader environment encompasses emerging market equities navigating global trade dynamics, currency fluctuations, and domestic policy shifts, alongside the semiconductor sector benefiting from sustained demand in artificial intelligence, data centers, and advanced computing applications. Capital flows into technology infrastructure continue to influence semiconductor valuations, while emerging markets respond to interest rate trajectories, commodity price movements, and geopolitical developments affecting supply chains. Regulatory considerations around export controls on advanced chips and evolving trade policies represent ongoing factors for both themes. These conditions create differentiated opportunities for leveraged exposure depending on investor views on global growth versus specialized technology adoption.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, EDC has exhibited sensitivity to broad emerging market sentiment, currency movements, and regional economic indicators, resulting in amplified but diversified volatility relative to its benchmark. SOXL has demonstrated sharper responses to semiconductor-specific catalysts such as earnings from leading chipmakers and shifts in technology capital expenditure trends, often producing higher relative volatility due to its concentrated thematic focus. Both ETFs reflect the daily-reset nature of leveraged products, where performance over multi-day periods diverges from simple multiples of underlying index returns. Relative positioning favors EDC for investors seeking exposure across multiple emerging economies and SOXL for those targeting concentrated technology momentum within the semiconductor value chain.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing leveraged products like EDC and SOXL may use the platform to apply additional quantitative overlays aligned with their risk parameters.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including cost efficiency, thematic concentration, and alignment with prevailing technology sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to SOXL. The lower expense ratio and focused exposure to semiconductor dynamics provide a more streamlined profile for capturing targeted industry trends compared with the broader, higher-cost emerging markets leverage offered by EDC. This assessment remains conditional on continued sector strength and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EDC vs. SOXL commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDC is a Hold and SOXL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXL has more net assets: 20.3B vs. EDC (194M). SOXL has a higher annual dividend yield than EDC: SOXL (179.039) vs EDC (57.642). EDC was incepted earlier than SOXL: EDC (18 years) vs SOXL (17 years). SOXL (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than EDC (1.09). EDC has a higher turnover SOXL (250.00) vs SOXL (250.00).
EDCSOXLEDC / SOXL
Gain YTD57.642179.03932%
Net Assets194M20.3B1%
Total Expense Ratio1.090.75145%
Turnover347.00250.00139%
Yield1.350.0115,143%
Fund Existence18 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDCSOXL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPMFX19.760.09
+0.46%
Reinhart Genesis PMV Advisor
FVRMX26.560.03
+0.11%
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val Adv
CMVIX30.66N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Instl
AMRAX6.28N/A
N/A
American Growth One A
GCICX19.77-0.01
-0.05%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts C

SOXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXL has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXL jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXL
1D Price
Change %
SOXL100%
+9.87%
ONTO - SOXL
81%
Closely correlated
+6.16%
ASX - SOXL
80%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
TSM - SOXL
80%
Closely correlated
+2.85%
RMBS - SOXL
76%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
STM - SOXL
72%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
More