Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDIAX vs FWCBX
EDIAX vs FWCBX Comparison
Open Charts EDIAX vs FWCBX
EDIAX vs FWCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. EDIAX (316M). EDIAX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: EDIAX (4.93) vs FWCBX (2.97). EDIAX was incepted earlier than FWCBX: EDIAX (21 years) vs FWCBX (6 years). EDIAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). EDIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EDIAX: FWCBX (250) vs EDIAX (1000). EDIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.06 vs. FWCBX (12.18). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. EDIAX (34.67).
| EDIAX | FWCBX | EDIAX / FWCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.496 | 7.411 | 101% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 316M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.93 | 2.97 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.06 | 12.18 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.55 | 42.50 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.67 | 42.08 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement