Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDIAX vs FWCBX
EDIAX vs FWCBX Comparison
Open Charts EDIAX vs FWCBX
EDIAX vs FWCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDIAX vs. FWCBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDIAX is a Buy and FWCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. EDIAX (319M). EDIAX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: EDIAX (5.04) vs FWCBX (2.91). EDIAX was incepted earlier than FWCBX: EDIAX (21 years) vs FWCBX (6 years). EDIAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). EDIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EDIAX: FWCBX (250) vs EDIAX (1000). EDIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. FWCBX (7.87). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.51 vs. EDIAX (31.63).
| EDIAX | FWCBX | EDIAX / FWCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.665 | 9.823 | 78% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.04 | 2.91 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.57 | 7.87 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.91 | 45.51 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.63 | 44.51 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement