EDVR
Price
$12.38
Change
+$0.08 (+0.65%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
35.02M
FLEW
Price
$55.00
Change
-$3.00 (-5.17%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

EDVR vs FLEW

Header iconEDVR vs FLEW Comparison
Open Charts EDVR vs FLEWBanner chart's image
Endeavor Ban
Price$12.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.65%)
Volume$1.64K
Capitalization35.02M
Fleetwood Bank
Price$55.00
Change-$3.00 (-5.17%)
Volume$229
CapitalizationN/A
EDVR vs FLEW Comparison Chart
Loading...
EDVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDVR vs. FLEW commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDVR is a Hold and FLEW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (EDVR: $12.38 vs. FLEW: $55.00)
Brand notoriety: EDVR and FLEW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDVR: 24% vs. FLEW: 179%
Market capitalization -- EDVR: $35.02M vs. FLEW: $0
EDVR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $35.02M. FLEW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLEW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EDVR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLEW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EDVR is a better buy in the long-term than FLEW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDVR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLEW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDVR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FLEW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLEW is a better buy in the short-term than EDVR.

Price Growth

EDVR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.53% price change this week, while FLEW (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDVR YTD gains are higher at: 0.618 vs. FLEW (0.000).
EDVRFLEWEDVR / FLEW
Capitalization35MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.6180.000-
P/E Ratio9.11N/A-
Revenue19.2MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt16.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDVR vs FLEW: Fundamental Ratings
EDVR
FLEW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
8174
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
563
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLEW's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDVR (66). This means that FLEW’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDVR’s over the last 12 months.

EDVR's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLEW (100). This means that EDVR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLEW’s over the last 12 months.

FLEW's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as EDVR (81). This means that FLEW’s stock grew similarly to EDVR’s over the last 12 months.

EDVR's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FLEW (56). This means that EDVR’s stock grew similarly to FLEW’s over the last 12 months.

EDVR's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLEW (63). This means that EDVR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLEW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDVRFLEW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
37%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EDVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSVIX15.990.09
+0.57%
RBC Small Cap Value I
TRVHX18.370.10
+0.55%
Nuveen Mid Cap Value I
JNVMX14.250.06
+0.42%
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR6
FEQIX75.810.26
+0.34%
Fidelity Equity-Income
LSOFX18.630.05
+0.27%
LS Opportunity Fund Institutional Class

EDVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDVR has been loosely correlated with PVBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDVR jumps, then PVBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDVR
1D Price
Change %
EDVR100%
+0.62%
PVBK - EDVR
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
BQCNF - EDVR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - EDVR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOY - EDVR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYBC - EDVR
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More

FLEW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLEW has been loosely correlated with PVBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLEW jumps, then PVBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLEW
1D Price
Change %
FLEW100%
-5.17%
PVBK - FLEW
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
KBCSF - FLEW
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUMB - FLEW
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKQNY - FLEW
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
EDVR - FLEW
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
More