EDVR
Price
$11.95
Change
-$0.33 (-2.69%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
FMCB
Price
$1055.00
Change
+$39.75 (+3.92%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EDVR vs FMCB

Header iconEDVR vs FMCB Comparison
Open Charts EDVR vs FMCBBanner chart's image
Endeavor Ban
Price$11.95
Change-$0.33 (-2.69%)
Volume$8.97K
CapitalizationN/A
Farmers & Merchants Ban
Price$1055.00
Change+$39.75 (+3.92%)
Volume$80
CapitalizationN/A
EDVR vs FMCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
EDVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDVR vs. FMCB commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDVR is a Buy and FMCB is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (EDVR: $11.95 vs. FMCB: $1055.00)
Brand notoriety: EDVR and FMCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDVR: 205% vs. FMCB: 25%
Market capitalization -- EDVR: $35.02M vs. FMCB: $748.84M
EDVR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $35.02M. FMCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $748.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EDVR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMCB is a better buy in the long-term than EDVR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDVR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDVR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMCB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EDVR is a better buy in the short-term than FMCB.

Price Growth

EDVR (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FMCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMCB($749M) has a higher market cap than EDVR($35M). FMCB (9.18) and EDVR (9.11) have similar P/E ratio . EDVR YTD gains are higher at: 10.809 vs. FMCB (-2.269). FMCB has less debt than EDVR: FMCB (10.3M) vs EDVR (16.1M). FMCB has higher revenues than EDVR: FMCB (211M) vs EDVR (19.2M).
EDVRFMCBEDVR / FMCB
Capitalization35M749M5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.809-2.269-476%
P/E Ratio9.119.1899%
Revenue19.2M211M9%
Total CashN/A68.3M-
Total Debt16.1M10.3M156%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDVR vs FMCB: Fundamental Ratings
EDVR
FMCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3159
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6817
SMR RATING
1..100
7917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
655
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDVR's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCB (64). This means that EDVR’s stock grew similarly to FMCB’s over the last 12 months.

FMCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDVR (68). This means that FMCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDVR’s over the last 12 months.

FMCB's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDVR (79). This means that FMCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDVR’s over the last 12 months.

EDVR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCB (51). This means that EDVR’s stock grew similarly to FMCB’s over the last 12 months.

EDVR's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMCB (55). This means that EDVR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDVRFMCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
12%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EDVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLSA36.21N/A
N/A
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
FJUN52.20-0.08
-0.15%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jun
DJUN43.81-0.08
-0.18%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bfr ETF Jun
SPHQ69.47-0.32
-0.46%
Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF
PEZ105.31-1.59
-1.48%
Invesco DW Consumer Cyclicals Momt ETF

EDVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDVR has been loosely correlated with PVBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDVR jumps, then PVBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDVR
1D Price
Change %
EDVR100%
N/A
PVBK - EDVR
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BQCNF - EDVR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - EDVR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOY - EDVR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYBC - EDVR
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More

FMCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMCB and CMUV have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMCB and CMUV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCB
1D Price
Change %
FMCB100%
+0.32%
CMUV - FMCB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVR - FMCB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBBI - FMCB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
SFST - FMCB
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
FMBL - FMCB
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
More