It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EEFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EEFT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
EEFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.66% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.40%.
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
EEFT | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 22 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EEFT | LSAT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago69% | 16 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with DOX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then DOX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEFT | 100% | -1.81% | ||
DOX - EEFT | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
SSNC - EEFT | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
PTC - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
CPAY - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
ACIW - EEFT | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSAT has been closely correlated with EEFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSAT jumps, then EEFT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT | 100% | -0.76% | ||
EEFT - LSAT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
TNL - LSAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
AVT - LSAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -8.29% | ||
EQH - LSAT | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.08% | ||
DINO - LSAT | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
More |