EEFT vs XMLV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEFT is a StrongBuy and XMLV is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EEFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- EEFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EEFT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EEFT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EEFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.21% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+5.81% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
EEFT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EEFT | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 69% | 18 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AOA | 76.16 | 0.30 | +0.40% |
| iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allc ETF | |||
| SDG | 72.14 | 0.06 | +0.08% |
| iShares MSCI Global Sust Dev Goals ETF | |||
| VABS | 24.31 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF | |||
| IBMN | 26.69 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| EFRA | 29.09 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Environmental Infras & IndstrETF | |||
EEFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with DOX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then DOX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEFT | 100% | -2.17% | ||
| DOX - EEFT | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SSNC - EEFT | 59% Loosely correlated | -6.12% | ||
| PTC - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| ACIW - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| CPAY - EEFT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||
XMLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMLV has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMLV jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMLV | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| FNB - XMLV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| CBSH - XMLV | 74% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| EEFT - XMLV | 74% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| STWD - XMLV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| MORN - XMLV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||