Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FTHF
EEM vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FTHF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$48.26
Change-$0.16 (-0.33%)
Volume$27.34M
Net Assets18.36B
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$26.62
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
Volume$580
Net Assets46.38M
EEM vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FTHF commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and FTHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 18.4B vs. FTHF (46.4M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EEM: FTHF (27.228) vs EEM (16.516). EEM was incepted earlier than FTHF: EEM (22 years) vs FTHF (2 years). EEM (0.72) and FTHF (0.75) have comparable expense ratios . FTHF has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | FTHF | EEM / FTHF | |
| Gain YTD | 16.516 | 27.228 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 18.4B | 46.4M | 39,655% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.75 | 96% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 30.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 2.45 | 2.76 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
More | ||||
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTHF has been loosely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTHF jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
More | ||||