Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FTHF
EEM vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FTHF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$52.70
Change-$0.11 (-0.21%)
Volume$174.45K
Net Assets20.22B
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$29.69
Change+$0.22 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.42M
EEM vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FTHF commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Buy and FTHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 20.2B vs. FTHF (53.4M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EEM: FTHF (41.864) vs EEM (27.502). EEM was incepted earlier than FTHF: EEM (22 years) vs FTHF (2 years). EEM (0.72) and FTHF (0.75) have comparable expense ratios . FTHF has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | FTHF | EEM / FTHF | |
| Gain YTD | 27.502 | 41.864 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 20.2B | 53.4M | 37,828% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.75 | 96% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 30.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 2.37 | 2.70 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +6.07% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | +4.07% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and OUT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and OUT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | +0.70% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
More | ||||