EEM
Price
$64.59
Change
-$4.51 (-6.53%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
31.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTHF
Price
$44.81
Change
-$4.56 (-9.24%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:18 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
127.17M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EEM vs FTHF

Header iconEEM vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FTHFBanner chart's image
EEM vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) vs. First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) offers broad, passive exposure to large- and mid-cap equities across emerging markets via the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, with approximately 1,200 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.72%.
  • First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) employs a rules-based thematic strategy targeting companies that promote human flourishing, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio of roughly 110 holdings and a slightly higher expense ratio of 0.75%.
  • Sector allocations differ markedly: EEM provides diversified emerging-market exposure with significant weights in technology, financials, and consumer sectors, while FTHF tilts heavily toward technology (approximately 50%) and financials (approximately 25%).
  • Top holdings in both ETFs overlap in semiconductor leaders such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Samsung Electronics, and SK Hynix, but FTHF exhibits greater concentration in these names.
  • EEM benefits from greater liquidity and scale as one of the largest emerging-markets ETFs, whereas FTHF, launched in late 2023, represents a newer thematic approach with potentially higher volatility due to its concentrated positioning.
  • Investors seeking broad diversification may prefer EEM, while those aligned with human-flourishing metrics and willing to accept thematic concentration may consider FTHF.

Introduction

Emerging markets continue to attract investor attention amid shifting global supply chains, technological advancements, and evolving macroeconomic conditions. The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) both target equities in these economies yet pursue distinct strategies. EEM delivers broad market-cap-weighted exposure, while FTHF applies a specialized rules-based screen. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer alternative pathways for investors seeking emerging-market growth with differing risk and thematic profiles.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Overview

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. This index includes large- and mid-cap stocks from emerging-market countries. The ETF holds approximately 1,200 securities, providing broad diversification across regions and sectors. Top holdings typically feature Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, Tencent Holdings, and Alibaba Group. Sector exposure emphasizes information technology, financials, consumer discretionary, and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.72%. As a traditional index-tracking vehicle, EEM employs full replication or optimized sampling with periodic rebalancing aligned to the underlying index. Its large asset base supports strong liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads on major exchanges.

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) Overview

The First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) is a rules-based thematic ETF launched in October 2023. It tracks the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index, which selects large- and mid-cap emerging-market companies meeting quantitative criteria related to human flourishing metrics. The fund maintains roughly 110 holdings, resulting in a concentrated portfolio. Top positions often include SK Hynix, Samsung Electronics, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Petróleo Brasileiro (Petrobras), and MediaTek. Sector weights show pronounced exposure to information technology (around 50%) and financials (around 25%), with smaller allocations to materials and energy. The expense ratio is 0.75%. The strategy involves systematic screening and periodic rebalancing according to index rules rather than traditional active management.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Emerging-market equities remain influenced by global semiconductor demand, geopolitical developments in Asia, commodity price trends, and monetary policy shifts in major economies. Technology and financial sectors have experienced capital flows tied to artificial intelligence adoption and domestic consumption recovery in key markets. Regulatory changes affecting data privacy, cross-border investment, and environmental standards continue to shape company selection. Broader macroeconomic drivers include interest-rate expectations, currency fluctuations, and supply-chain diversification away from single-country dependence. Both ETFs operate within this environment, though their methodologies lead to different sensitivities to sector-specific catalysts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, EEM has reflected broad emerging-market equity movements, with performance driven by diversified exposure across technology leaders and financial institutions. Its larger number of holdings tends to moderate volatility relative to more concentrated peers. FTHF, with its thematic focus and heavier technology weighting, has shown greater sensitivity to semiconductor cycles and innovation-driven rallies in recent weeks and months. The concentrated nature of FTHF can amplify returns during favorable rotations into high-conviction names but may also increase drawdowns during sector-specific corrections. Relative positioning favors EEM for investors prioritizing liquidity and diversification, while FTHF suits those seeking targeted exposure aligned with human-flourishing criteria amid ongoing technological and economic transitions.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing emerging-market ETFs may find the tool useful for refining screens around sector exposure and volatility metrics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) currently presents a more balanced profile for broad emerging-market exposure. Its lower expense ratio, significantly higher number of holdings, established liquidity, and diversified sector allocation support greater consistency across market environments. First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) offers differentiated thematic exposure but carries higher concentration risk and a modestly elevated cost structure. In probabilistic terms, the AI assessment leans toward EEM for investors prioritizing diversification and cost efficiency within the emerging-markets category.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EEM vs. FTHF commentary
Jun 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and FTHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 31.2B vs. FTHF (127M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EEM: FTHF (49.580) vs EEM (26.302). EEM was incepted earlier than FTHF: EEM (23 years) vs FTHF (3 years). EEM (0.72) and FTHF (0.75) have comparable expense ratios . FTHF has a higher turnover EEM (8.00) vs EEM (8.00).
EEMFTHFEEM / FTHF
Gain YTD26.30249.58053%
Net Assets31.2B127M24,567%
Total Expense Ratio0.720.7596%
Turnover8.0038.0021%
Yield1.773.0359%
Fund Existence23 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EEMFTHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRPFX79.92N/A
N/A
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
HFEAX64.20N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson European Focus A
ARIHX7.35N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity I
JCCIX19.02N/A
N/A
JHancock Small Cap Core I
PISJX15.71N/A
N/A
Columbia Pyrford International Stock R

EEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEM
1D Price
Change %
EEM100%
-1.17%
BABA - EEM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
JD - EEM
70%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
KC - EEM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
BILI - EEM
69%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
BIDU - EEM
67%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
More

FTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and GFI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and GFI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTHF
1D Price
Change %
FTHF100%
-1.10%
GFI - FTHF
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
CLS - FTHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.16%
ABG - FTHF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
OUT - FTHF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
SLM - FTHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.68%
More