Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FLAX
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$92.27
Change-$0.36 (-0.39%)
Volume$45.13K
Net Assets1.55B
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$29.36
Change-$0.11 (-0.37%)
Volume$18.45K
Net Assets35.05M
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and FLAX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.55B vs. FLAX (35M). FLAX (30.065) and EEMA (29.075) have matching annual dividend yield . EEMA was incepted earlier than FLAX: EEMA (14 years) vs FLAX (8 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EEMA (0.49). EEMA has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| EEMA | FLAX | EEMA / FLAX | |
| Gain YTD | 29.075 | 30.065 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 35M | 4,417% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.19 | 258% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 4.50 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 1.71 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 24 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
FLAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAX and ACGP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAX and ACGP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAX | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| ACGP - FLAX | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
| WB - FLAX | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| TUYA - FLAX | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
| DQ - FLAX | 16% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
| TME - FLAX | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||