Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FLAX
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$93.14
Change+$1.86 (+2.04%)
Volume$300
Net Assets1.54B
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$28.81
Change-$0.30 (-1.03%)
Volume$10.66K
Net Assets34.83M
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FLAX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and FLAX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.54B vs. FLAX (34.8M). EEMA (27.692) and FLAX (27.631) have matching annual dividend yield . EEMA was incepted earlier than FLAX: EEMA (14 years) vs FLAX (8 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EEMA (0.49). EEMA has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| EEMA | FLAX | EEMA / FLAX | |
| Gain YTD | 27.692 | 27.631 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 34.8M | 4,431% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.19 | 258% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 4.50 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.30 | 1.79 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | -1.05% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -3.98% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -4.60% | ||
More | ||||
FLAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAX and ACGP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAX and ACGP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAX | 100% | -1.02% | ||
| ACGP - FLAX | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||
| TUYA - FLAX | 15% Poorly correlated | -4.44% | ||
| DQ - FLAX | 12% Poorly correlated | +4.11% | ||
| WB - FLAX | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.89% | ||
| VIPS - FLAX | 12% Poorly correlated | -4.81% | ||
More | ||||