Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FLAX
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$90.17
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
Volume$23.45K
Net Assets1.46B
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$28.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.1K
Net Assets32.91M
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FLAX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Buy and FLAX is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.47B vs. FLAX (32.9M). FLAX (26.184) and EEMA (26.138) have matching annual dividend yield . EEMA was incepted earlier than FLAX: EEMA (14 years) vs FLAX (8 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EEMA (0.49). EEMA has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| EEMA | FLAX | EEMA / FLAX | |
| Gain YTD | 26.138 | 26.184 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 32.9M | 4,453% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.19 | 258% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 4.50 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 1.90 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 79% | 14 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | +4.09% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| BZ - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||
FLAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAX and ACGP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAX and ACGP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAX | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| ACGP - FLAX | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TUYA - FLAX | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
| VIPS - FLAX | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| BEKE - FLAX | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| TME - FLAX | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.42% | ||
More | ||||