Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FLAX
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$86.28
Change-$0.27 (-0.31%)
Volume$182
Net Assets1.42B
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$27.36
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
Volume$200
Net Assets32.61M
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FLAX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and FLAX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.42B vs. FLAX (32.6M). FLAX (21.515) and EEMA (21.069) have matching annual dividend yield . EEMA was incepted earlier than FLAX: EEMA (14 years) vs FLAX (8 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EEMA (0.49). EEMA has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| EEMA | FLAX | EEMA / FLAX | |
| Gain YTD | 21.069 | 21.515 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 32.6M | 4,368% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.19 | 258% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 4.50 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.41 | 1.93 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 14 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -3.31% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
More | ||||