Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMAX vs RNWBX
EEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EEMAX vs RNWBX
Columbia Emerging Markets A
Price$16.49
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets753.02M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.88B
EEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. EEMAX (753M). EEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EEMAX (0.82) vs RNWBX (0.12). EEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EEMAX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EEMAX (1.54). EEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMAX: RNWBX (250) vs EEMAX (2000). EEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.17 vs. RNWBX (19.85). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.70 vs. EEMAX (-5.05).
| EEMAX | RNWBX | EEMAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.67 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.67 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.533 | 25.112 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 753M | 74.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.12 | 701% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.17 | 19.85 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.97 | 45.29 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.05 | 15.70 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.90 | 85.75 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement