Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMAX vs RNWBX
EEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EEMAX vs RNWBX
Columbia Emerging Markets A
Price$15.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets735.08M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
EEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. EEMAX (735M). EEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EEMAX (0.94) vs RNWBX (0.13). EEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EEMAX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EEMAX (1.54). EEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMAX: RNWBX (250) vs EEMAX (2000). EEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. RNWBX (12.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. EEMAX (3.08).
| EEMAX | RNWBX | EEMAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.67 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.67 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.324 | 17.729 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 735M | 71.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.13 | 729% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 12.87 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.33 | 30.09 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.08 | 22.93 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.08 | 72.17 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement