Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMAX vs RNWBX
EEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EEMAX vs RNWBX
EEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EEMAX (884M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than EEMAX: RNWBX (0.41) vs EEMAX (0.04). EEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EEMAX (19 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) and EEMAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . EEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMAX: RNWBX (250) vs EEMAX (2000). EEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.14 vs. RNWBX (26.72). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.77 vs. EEMAX (13.17).
| EEMAX | RNWBX | EEMAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.66 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.66 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.823 | 16.263 | 214% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 884M | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.41 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.14 | 26.72 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.66 | 46.29 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.17 | 14.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.38 | 115.61 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement