Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMAX vs RNWFX
EEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMAX vs RNWFX
EEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EEMAX (884M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMAX: RNWFX (1.20) vs EEMAX (0.04). EEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EEMAX (19 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). EEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs EEMAX (2000). EEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.14 vs. RNWFX (28.35). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.51 vs. EEMAX (13.17).
| EEMAX | RNWFX | EEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.62 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.62 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.823 | 16.816 | 207% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 884M | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.14 | 28.35 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.66 | 51.60 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.17 | 20.51 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.38 | 128.78 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers