Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMAX vs RNWHX
EEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EEMAX vs RNWHX
EEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EEMAX (884M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EEMAX: RNWHX (1.15) vs EEMAX (0.04). EEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMAX (19 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs EEMAX (2000). EEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.14 vs. RNWHX (28.13). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.74 vs. EEMAX (13.17).
| EEMAX | RNWHX | EEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.72 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.823 | 16.774 | 208% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 884M | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.14 | 28.13 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.66 | 50.96 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.17 | 19.74 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.38 | 125.74 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement