Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMDX vs FNWFX
EEMDX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMDX vs FNWFX
EEMDX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EEMDX (5.57M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMDX: FNWFX (1.24) vs EEMDX (0.84). EEMDX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: EEMDX (5 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). EEMDX (10.84) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMDX (34.00). EEMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: EEMDX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). EEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.43 vs. FNWFX (19.73). EEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 33.42 vs. FNWFX (14.94).
| EEMDX | FNWFX | EEMDX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.57 | 361% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 0.57 | 1,902% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.614 | 12.743 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.24 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.43 | 19.73 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.38 | 44.48 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.42 | 14.94 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement