Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMFX vs RNWHX
EEMFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EEMFX vs RNWHX
EEMFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EEMFX (5.57M). EEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EEMFX (1.36) vs RNWHX (1.14). EEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMFX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMFX (10.09) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMFX (34.00). EEMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: EEMFX (0) vs RNWHX (250). EEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.57 vs. RNWHX (19.47). EEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.55 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| EEMFX | RNWHX | EEMFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.72 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.09 | 0.72 | 1,401% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.091 | 12.651 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.14 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.57 | 19.47 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.15 | 43.67 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.55 | 14.04 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement