RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EEMFX (5.46M). EEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EEMFX (1.40) vs RNWHX (1.17). EEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMFX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMFX (10.09) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMFX (34.00). EEMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: EEMFX (0) vs RNWHX (250). EEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.62 vs. RNWHX (21.78). EEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.09 vs. RNWHX (17.87).

	EEMFX	RNWHX	EEMFX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	1.31	0.72	182%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	10.09	0.72	1,401%
Fund Existence	5 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	19.527	13.978	140%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	5.46M	90.7B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	1.40	1.17	120%
Returns for 1 year	34.62	21.78	159%
Returns for 3 years	62.04	44.40	140%
Returns for 5 years	41.09	17.87	230%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	107.97	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
SPFCX	20.31	0.25	+1.25%
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth C
MAIHX	21.74	0.10	+0.46%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq IR
LASGX	20.10	0.08	+0.40%
Lord Abbett International Growth R4
WGICX	9.85	N/A	N/A
Wasatch Micro Cap Institutional
SHSSX	67.37	-0.75	-1.10%
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Instl