Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMGX vs FNWFX
EEMGX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMGX vs FNWFX
EEMGX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EEMGX (5.57M). EEMGX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: EEMGX (1.54) vs FNWFX (1.24). EEMGX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: EEMGX (5 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). EEMGX (9.84) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMGX (34.00). EEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: EEMGX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). EEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.87 vs. FNWFX (19.73). EEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.32 vs. FNWFX (14.94).
| EEMGX | FNWFX | EEMGX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.57 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 9.84 | 0.57 | 1,726% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.244 | 12.743 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.24 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.87 | 19.73 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.49 | 44.48 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.32 | 14.94 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement