RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. EEMGX (5.7M). EEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EEMGX (1.58) vs RNWHX (1.17). EEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMGX (6 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMGX (9.84) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMGX (34.00). EEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: EEMGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). EEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.52 vs. RNWHX (20.60). EEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.89 vs. RNWHX (18.98).

	EEMGX	RNWHX	EEMGX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	1.06	0.72	147%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	9.84	0.72	1,367%
Fund Existence	6 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	24.902	16.697	149%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	5.7M	88.6B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	1.58	1.17	135%
Returns for 1 year	37.52	20.60	182%
Returns for 3 years	77.88	51.90	150%
Returns for 5 years	46.89	18.98	247%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	109.02	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
TMAPX	58.07	-0.02	-0.03%
Touchstone Mid Cap A
GSELX	74.96	-0.23	-0.31%
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights Instl
MINGX	49.46	-0.24	-0.48%
MFS International Intrinsic Equity R3
LFSFX	33.57	-0.18	-0.53%
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
SGGCX	56.31	-0.69	-1.21%
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth C