Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMGX vs RNWHX
EEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EEMGX vs RNWHX
EEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EEMGX (5.57M). EEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EEMGX (1.54) vs RNWHX (1.14). EEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMGX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMGX (9.84) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMGX (34.00). EEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: EEMGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). EEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.87 vs. RNWHX (19.47). EEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.32 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| EEMGX | RNWHX | EEMGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.72 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 9.84 | 0.72 | 1,367% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.244 | 12.651 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.14 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.87 | 19.47 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.49 | 43.67 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.32 | 14.04 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement