RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EEMGX (5.46M). EEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EEMGX (1.58) vs RNWHX (1.17). EEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMGX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMGX (9.84) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMGX (34.00). EEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: EEMGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). EEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.08 vs. RNWHX (21.78). EEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.89 vs. RNWHX (17.87).

	EEMGX	RNWHX	EEMGX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	1.06	0.72	147%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	9.84	0.72	1,367%
Fund Existence	5 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	19.685	13.978	141%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	5.46M	90.7B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	1.58	1.17	135%
Returns for 1 year	35.08	21.78	161%
Returns for 3 years	63.37	44.40	143%
Returns for 5 years	42.89	17.87	240%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	107.97	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
SPFAX	30.40	0.38	+1.27%
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth A
MSIBX	22.31	0.10	+0.45%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq A
LOAGX	20.23	0.08	+0.40%
Lord Abbett International Growth F3
WMICX	9.83	0.01	+0.10%
Wasatch Micro Cap
SHSCX	45.68	-0.51	-1.10%
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Inv C