Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMGX vs RNWHX
EEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EEMGX vs RNWHX
EEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EEMGX (5.7M). EEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EEMGX (1.53) vs RNWHX (1.15). EEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMGX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMGX (9.84) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMGX (34.00). EEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: EEMGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). EEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.94 vs. RNWHX (31.15). EEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.05 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| EEMGX | RNWHX | EEMGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.72 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 9.84 | 0.72 | 1,367% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.067 | 18.743 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.7M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.15 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.94 | 31.15 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.49 | 57.37 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.05 | 20.21 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement