RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. EEMHX (5.93M). EEMHX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EEMHX (1.52) vs RNWHX (1.15). EEMHX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMHX (6 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMHX (9.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMHX (34.00). EEMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: EEMHX (0) vs RNWHX (250). EEMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.51 vs. RNWHX (17.19). EEMHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.93 vs. RNWHX (17.68).

	EEMHX	RNWHX	EEMHX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	0.99	0.72	138%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	9.83	0.72	1,365%
Fund Existence	6 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	26.280	16.447	160%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	5.93M	90B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	1.52	1.15	132%
Returns for 1 year	33.51	17.19	195%
Returns for 3 years	82.51	53.84	153%
Returns for 5 years	44.93	17.68	254%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	111.44	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
FLPEX	46.31	0.28	+0.61%
Fidelity Advisor Low-Priced Stock C
FACDX	64.25	N/A	N/A
Fidelity Advisor Health Care A
EXHAX	26.61	N/A	N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
LMCFX	35.98	N/A	N/A
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
MSAWX	22.51	N/A	N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp C