Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMRX vs RNWHX
EEMRX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EEMRX vs RNWHX
EEMRX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EEMRX (5.43M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EEMRX: RNWHX (1.14) vs EEMRX (0.95). EEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMRX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMRX (10.84) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMRX (34.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMRX: RNWHX (250) vs EEMRX (1000). EEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.65 vs. RNWHX (20.31). EEMRX return over 5 years is better than : 29.19 vs. RNWHX (14.31).
| EEMRX | RNWHX | EEMRX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.72 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 0.72 | 1,506% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.725 | 13.641 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.43M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.14 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.65 | 20.31 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.87 | 47.80 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.19 | 14.31 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VKSDX | 10.26 | 0.11 | +1.08% |
| Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Value A | |||
| BGIKX | 14.49 | 0.08 | +0.56% |
| Baillie Gifford International Alpha K | |||
| MRGSX | 26.90 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| BlackRock Advantage Global R | |||
| FCMVX | 15.69 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 | |||
| GOGIX | 39.54 | -0.11 | -0.28% |
| JHancock International Growth I | |||