Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMRX vs RNWHX
EEMRX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EEMRX vs RNWHX
EEMRX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EEMRX (5.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EEMRX: RNWHX (1.15) vs EEMRX (0.94). EEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMRX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EEMRX (10.84) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EEMRX (34.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMRX: RNWHX (250) vs EEMRX (1000). EEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.82 vs. RNWHX (23.68). EEMRX return over 5 years is better than : 28.54 vs. RNWHX (15.35).
| EEMRX | RNWHX | EEMRX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.72 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 0.72 | 1,506% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.813 | 14.152 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.4M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.15 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.82 | 23.68 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.65 | 49.71 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.54 | 15.35 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers