Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEOFX vs FSMAX
EEOFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts EEOFX vs FSMAX
Pear Tree Essex Environmental Opps Odnry
Price$15.33
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.06M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
EEOFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEOFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEOFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. EEOFX (26.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than EEOFX: FSMAX (0.43) vs EEOFX (0.00). EEOFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: EEOFX (8 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). EEOFX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). EEOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEOFX: FSMAX (0) vs EEOFX (2500). EEOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. FSMAX (3.62). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. EEOFX (1.66).
| EEOFX | FSMAX | EEOFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.04 | 3,543% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.04 | 4,429% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.049 | 6.492 | 263% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1M | 41.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.38 | 3.62 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.29 | 49.92 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.66 | 33.53 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.09 | - |