Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEOFX vs FSMAX
EEOFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts EEOFX vs FSMAX
Pear Tree Essex Environmental Opps Odnry
Price$15.42
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.42M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
EEOFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEOFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEOFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. EEOFX (26.4M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than EEOFX: FSMAX (0.46) vs EEOFX (0.00). EEOFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: EEOFX (8 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). EEOFX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). EEOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEOFX: FSMAX (0) vs EEOFX (2500). FSMAX (21.74) and EEOFX (21.31) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. EEOFX (24.96).
| EEOFX | FSMAX | EEOFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.04 | 3,543% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.04 | 4,314% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.508 | 4.478 | 391% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.4M | 39.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.31 | 21.74 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.84 | 37.63 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.96 | 51.34 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.66 | - |