Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEOFX vs FSMAX
EEOFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts EEOFX vs FSMAX
Pear Tree Essex Environmental Opps Odnry
Price$16.44
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.55M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.11
Change-$0.61 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
EEOFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEOFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEOFX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. EEOFX (28.5M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than EEOFX: FSMAX (0.44) vs EEOFX (0.00). EEOFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: EEOFX (8 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). EEOFX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). EEOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEOFX: FSMAX (0) vs EEOFX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.49 vs. EEOFX (15.94). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.92 vs. EEOFX (19.04).
| EEOFX | FSMAX | EEOFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.04 | 3,543% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.04 | 4,429% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.688 | 13.028 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.5M | 41.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.94 | 18.49 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.34 | 71.83 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.04 | 51.92 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement