Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFA vs IMFL
EFA vs IMFL Comparison
Open Charts EFA vs IMFL
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$88.36
Change-$0.25 (-0.28%)
Volume$11.04M
Net Assets63.84B
Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF
Price$27.15
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
Volume$3.02K
Net Assets560.66M
EFA vs IMFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFA vs. IMFL commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFA is a Hold and IMFL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFA has more net assets: 63.8B vs. IMFL (561M). EFA has a higher annual dividend yield than IMFL: EFA (19.224) vs IMFL (17.499). EFA was incepted earlier than IMFL: EFA (24 years) vs IMFL (4 years). EFA (0.32) has a lower expense ratio than IMFL (0.34). IMFL has a higher turnover EFA (3.00) vs EFA (3.00).
| EFA | IMFL | EFA / IMFL | |
| Gain YTD | 19.224 | 17.499 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 561M | 11,373% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.34 | 94% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 156.00 | 2% |
| Yield | 2.88 | 2.62 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFA | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CISMX | 13.21 | 0.21 | +1.62% |
| Clarkston Partners Institutional | |||
| PAGHX | 114.07 | 1.60 | +1.42% |
| Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth C | |||
| FNCSX | 33.84 | 0.14 | +0.42% |
| Franklin Natural Resources R6 | |||
| JABAX | 48.97 | 0.16 | +0.33% |
| Janus Henderson Balanced T | |||
| GAOSX | 21.60 | 0.07 | +0.33% |
| JPMorgan Global Allocation I | |||
IMFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMFL | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| BHP - IMFL | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| FER - IMFL | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| TD - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| BN - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BNS - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||