EFA | IMFL | EFA / IMFL | |
Gain YTD | 19.129 | 17.918 | 107% |
Net Assets | 63.1B | 554M | 11,390% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.34 | 94% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 156.00 | 2% |
Yield | 2.76 | 2.96 | 93% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 4 years | - |
EFA | IMFL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IMFL | 100% | +1.05% | ||
BHP - IMFL | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
FER - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
TD - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
BN - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
BNS - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
More |