Ad is loading...
EFA vs IMFL
EFA vs IMFL Comparison
Open Charts EFA vs IMFL
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$81.54
Change-$0.51 (-0.62%)
Volume$11.63M
Net Assets57.22B
Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF
Price$25.35
Change-$0.16 (-0.63%)
Volume$64.91K
Net Assets517.86M
EFA vs IMFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFA vs. IMFL commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFA is a Buy and IMFL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFA has more net assets: 57.2B vs. IMFL (518M). IMFL (7.964) and EFA (7.843) have matching annual dividend yield . EFA was incepted earlier than IMFL: EFA (24 years) vs IMFL (4 years). IMFL has a higher turnover EFA (2.00) vs EFA (2.00).
| EFA | IMFL | EFA / IMFL | |
| Gain YTD | 7.843 | 7.964 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 57.2B | 518M | 11,042% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 341.00 | 1% |
| Yield | 2.81 | 3.78 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFA | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 80% | 21 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
IMFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMFL | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| BAM - IMFL | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| BHP - IMFL | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| TD - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BN - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| BNS - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||