| EFA | IMFL | EFA / IMFL | |
| Gain YTD | 9.210 | 13.703 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 77.1B | 1B | 7,687% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.34 | 94% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 65.00 | 6% |
| Yield | 3.24 | 2.89 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| EFA | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMFL | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| BHP - IMFL | 68% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| RIO - IMFL | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| SAN - IMFL | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| MFG - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| TD - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||