| EFAA | QYLD | EFAA / QYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 11.074 | 10.124 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 657M | 8.36B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.60 | 65% |
| Turnover | 6.00 | 24.46 | 25% |
| Yield | 8.15 | 9.88 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 13 years | - |
| EFAA | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 59% | 26 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 83% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QCAP | 25.09 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Apr | |||
| DFEB | 51.31 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb | |||
| CPST | 28.06 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Sep | |||
| JHCR | 24.91 | -0.05 | -0.20% |
| JHancock Core Bond ETF | |||
| EFU | 6.75 | -0.11 | -1.63% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAA has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFAA jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAA | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| SAN - EFAA | 74% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| MT - EFAA | 70% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| BBVA - EFAA | 69% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| NWG - EFAA | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| BHP - EFAA | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QYLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QYLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLD | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| LRCX - QYLD | 66% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| KLAC - QYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| AMAT - QYLD | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ASML - QYLD | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| TSLA - QYLD | 57% Loosely correlated | +5.14% | ||
More | ||||