WDS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EFAS | WDS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 2 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 2 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 2 days ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 2 days ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 2 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 2 days ago59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAS has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAS jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS | 100% | -0.44% | ||
BHP - EFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
RIO - EFAS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
WDS - EFAS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
TEF - EFAS | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
BBVA - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WDS | 100% | +0.06% | ||
VET - WDS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
FANG - WDS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
CNQ - WDS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
CHRD - WDS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
HES - WDS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More |