VET
Price
$10.17
Change
-$0.19 (-1.83%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.57B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WDS
Price
$20.11
Change
-$0.67 (-3.22%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
38.92B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

VET vs WDS

Header iconVET vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts VET vs WDSBanner chart's image
VET vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) vs. Woodside Energy Group Ltd. (WDS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) reported strong first-quarter 2026 production exceeding guidance at approximately 125,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d), alongside portfolio repositioning through a German acquisition and Croatia divestment.
  • Woodside Energy Group Ltd. (WDS) delivered record 2025 production of 198.8 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMboe), with a trailing twelve-month (TTM) profit margin of 20.93%.
  • VET shares have rallied significantly over the past year, up over 100%, reflecting momentum in core assets, while WDS posted year-to-date gains of nearly 48% amid LNG market dynamics.
  • WDS boasts a larger market capitalization of $44.2 billion and positive earnings per share (EPS) of $1.42 TTM, contrasting VET's $1.9 billion cap and negative EPS.
  • Both offer attractive dividend yields around 3-5%, with WDS at 4.86% and VET at 3.14%, appealing to income-focused energy investors.
  • Recent market activity highlights VET's growth catalysts in Europe versus WDS's scale and profitability in LNG production.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) and Woodside Energy Group Ltd. (WDS), two players in the international oil and natural gas sector. Both companies focus on upstream production amid fluctuating commodity prices and geopolitical influences on energy markets. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing dividends or growth in liquefied natural gas (LNG) and conventional assets may find value in analyzing their relative performance, business models, and recent developments. This analysis highlights contrasts in scale, regional exposure, and market positioning to aid informed decision-making in the current energy landscape.

VET Overview and Recent Performance

Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) is an international oil and gas producer with assets in North America, Europe, and Australia, emphasizing acquisition, exploration, and optimization of producing properties. Headquartered in Calgary, Canada, the company targets diversified hydrocarbon output. In recent market activity, VET shares have climbed from a 52-week low of $5.90 to around $12.35, reflecting a beta of 0.55 indicative of moderate volatility relative to the market. Key influences include strong first-quarter 2026 production surpassing guidance and strategic moves like acquiring German assets, securing new land concessions, and divesting Croatia interests, signaling portfolio repositioning toward higher-value opportunities. Sentiment has benefited from core asset strength and a 67% three-month gain, though negative EPS of -$1.73 underscores earnings pressures amid gas-heavy exposure.

WDS Overview and Recent Performance

Woodside Energy Group Ltd. (WDS) is a major Australian energy firm engaged in hydrocarbons exploration, production, and marketing, with significant liquefied natural gas (LNG) operations across Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Americas. Key assets include Pluto LNG and North West Shelf. Trading near $23.13 with a substantial $44.2 billion market cap, WDS exhibits low market sensitivity via a beta of -0.25. Recent performance features record 2025 production of 198.8 MMboe, driving a 77% one-year return despite a tempered 2026 outlook and quarterly revenue growth challenges. Positive factors include a TTM PE ratio of 16.29, EPS of $1.42, and robust profitability margins, bolstering investor confidence amid LNG demand shifts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored to current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML trend following, multi-agent systems, and fundamental analysis (FA), with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standout performers include bots with annualized returns up to +167.52%, win rates ranging 48-88%, profit factors of 1.5-6.9, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in sectors like semiconductors and aerospace. Average trade durations vary from hours to weeks, offering styles for scalpers to swing traders. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots matching your risk profile and timeframe.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Vermilion Energy (VET) operates a nimble, geographically diverse upstream model focused on oil and gas optimization, contrasting Woodside Energy (WDS)’s large-scale, LNG-centric integrated operations with global marketing. Growth drivers for VET center on European repositioning and production beats, while WDS leverages record output and project pipelines like Scarborough. Recent momentum favors VET’s sharper three-month surge amid smaller-cap agility, versus WDS’s steadier YTD climb. Risk profiles differ: VET faces higher volatility and losses (debt/equity not specified recently), while WDS offers stability with 34% debt/equity and 1.59 current ratio. Both share energy sector exposure to oil/gas prices, but WDS sentiment benefits from profitability, whereas VET draws on operational catalysts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor Woodside Energy Group Ltd. (WDS) in the current environment due to its superior scale, consistent profitability, record production history, and stronger balance sheet metrics like positive EPS and high ROE. While VET exhibits promising production momentum and diversification upside, WDS’s relative stability and LNG positioning provide higher probabilistic edge amid volatile energy trends.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
VET vs. WDS commentary
Jun 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VET is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 18, 2026
Stock price -- (VET: $10.18 vs. WDS: $20.10)
Brand notoriety: VET and WDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VET: 95% vs. WDS: 181%
Market capitalization -- VET: $1.57B vs. WDS: $38.92B
VET [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.57B. WDS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $38.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $135.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • VET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the long-term than VET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both VET and WDS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

VET (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -10.54% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -8.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -7.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

VET is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

WDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-7.50% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDS($38.9B) has a higher market cap than VET($1.57B). VET has higher P/E ratio than WDS: VET (25.11) vs WDS (14.15). WDS YTD gains are higher at: 32.503 vs. VET (22.062). WDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.35B vs. VET (-453.68M). WDS has more cash in the bank: 5.94B vs. VET (16.4M). VET has less debt than WDS: VET (1.3B) vs WDS (13.7B). WDS has higher revenues than VET: WDS (13B) vs VET (1.92B).
VETWDSVET / WDS
Capitalization1.57B38.9B4%
EBITDA-453.68M9.35B-5%
Gain YTD22.06232.50368%
P/E Ratio25.1114.15177%
Revenue1.92B13B15%
Total Cash16.4M5.94B0%
Total Debt1.3B13.7B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VET vs WDS: Fundamental Ratings
VET
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9153
SMR RATING
1..100
9883
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDS's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as VET (26) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to VET’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VET (91) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VET’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as VET (98) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to VET’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as VET (59) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to VET’s over the last 12 months.

VET's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (15) in the null industry. This means that VET’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VETWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRIS0.400.02
+6.14%
Curis
IMUX14.200.49
+3.57%
Immunic Inc.
FNV226.93-3.24
-1.41%
Franco-Nevada Corp
SHC15.47-0.57
-3.55%
Sotera Health Company
QDEL13.12-0.99
-7.05%
QuidelOrtho Corp

VET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VET has been closely correlated with CNQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VET jumps, then CNQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VET
1D Price
Change %
VET100%
-1.74%
CNQ - VET
76%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
MGY - VET
74%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
OVV - VET
74%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
NOG - VET
71%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
FANG - VET
71%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
More

WDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDS
1D Price
Change %
WDS100%
-3.27%
VET - WDS
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
OVV - WDS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
EOG - WDS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
COP - WDS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
CNQ - WDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
More