This stock comparison examines Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) and Woodside Energy Group Ltd. (WDS), two players in the international oil and natural gas sector. Both companies focus on upstream production amid fluctuating commodity prices and geopolitical influences on energy markets. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing dividends or growth in liquefied natural gas (LNG) and conventional assets may find value in analyzing their relative performance, business models, and recent developments. This analysis highlights contrasts in scale, regional exposure, and market positioning to aid informed decision-making in the current energy landscape.
Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) is an international oil and gas producer with assets in North America, Europe, and Australia, emphasizing acquisition, exploration, and optimization of producing properties. Headquartered in Calgary, Canada, the company targets diversified hydrocarbon output. In recent market activity, VET shares have climbed from a 52-week low of $5.90 to around $12.35, reflecting a beta of 0.55 indicative of moderate volatility relative to the market. Key influences include strong first-quarter 2026 production surpassing guidance and strategic moves like acquiring German assets, securing new land concessions, and divesting Croatia interests, signaling portfolio repositioning toward higher-value opportunities. Sentiment has benefited from core asset strength and a 67% three-month gain, though negative EPS of -$1.73 underscores earnings pressures amid gas-heavy exposure.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd. (WDS) is a major Australian energy firm engaged in hydrocarbons exploration, production, and marketing, with significant liquefied natural gas (LNG) operations across Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Americas. Key assets include Pluto LNG and North West Shelf. Trading near $23.13 with a substantial $44.2 billion market cap, WDS exhibits low market sensitivity via a beta of -0.25. Recent performance features record 2025 production of 198.8 MMboe, driving a 77% one-year return despite a tempered 2026 outlook and quarterly revenue growth challenges. Positive factors include a TTM PE ratio of 16.29, EPS of $1.42, and robust profitability margins, bolstering investor confidence amid LNG demand shifts.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored to current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML trend following, multi-agent systems, and fundamental analysis (FA), with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standout performers include bots with annualized returns up to +167.52%, win rates ranging 48-88%, profit factors of 1.5-6.9, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in sectors like semiconductors and aerospace. Average trade durations vary from hours to weeks, offering styles for scalpers to swing traders. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots matching your risk profile and timeframe.
Vermilion Energy (VET) operates a nimble, geographically diverse upstream model focused on oil and gas optimization, contrasting Woodside Energy (WDS)’s large-scale, LNG-centric integrated operations with global marketing. Growth drivers for VET center on European repositioning and production beats, while WDS leverages record output and project pipelines like Scarborough. Recent momentum favors VET’s sharper three-month surge amid smaller-cap agility, versus WDS’s steadier YTD climb. Risk profiles differ: VET faces higher volatility and losses (debt/equity not specified recently), while WDS offers stability with 34% debt/equity and 1.59 current ratio. Both share energy sector exposure to oil/gas prices, but WDS sentiment benefits from profitability, whereas VET draws on operational catalysts.
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor Woodside Energy Group Ltd. (WDS) in the current environment due to its superior scale, consistent profitability, record production history, and stronger balance sheet metrics like positive EPS and high ROE. While VET exhibits promising production momentum and diversification upside, WDS’s relative stability and LNG positioning provide higher probabilistic edge amid volatile energy trends.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
VET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
VET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
VET (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -10.54% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -8.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -7.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.80%.
VET is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
WDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.
The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| VET | WDS | VET / WDS | |
| Capitalization | 1.57B | 38.9B | 4% |
| EBITDA | -453.68M | 9.35B | -5% |
| Gain YTD | 22.062 | 32.503 | 68% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.11 | 14.15 | 177% |
| Revenue | 1.92B | 13B | 15% |
| Total Cash | 16.4M | 5.94B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.3B | 13.7B | 10% |
VET | WDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WDS's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as VET (26) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to VET’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VET (91) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VET’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as VET (98) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to VET’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as VET (59) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to VET’s over the last 12 months.
VET's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (15) in the null industry. This means that VET’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
| VET | WDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VET has been closely correlated with CNQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VET jumps, then CNQ could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.