Advertisement
CNQ vs WDS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) vs. Woodside Energy Group (WDS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CNQ and WDS operate in the oil and gas exploration and production (E&P) sector, with CNQ boasting a larger market capitalization of $92.3 billion compared to WDS's $44.2 billion.
- WDS has shown stronger year-to-date returns at 52.49% versus CNQ's 33.03%, and one-year gains of 84.29% against 55.78%.
- CNQ trades at a lower trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 11.73 compared to WDS's 16.23, suggesting better relative valuation.
- Dividend yields are attractive for both, with WDS at 4.86% slightly edging CNQ's 4.06%.
- Recent catalysts include CNQ's quarterly profit beat and WDS's LNG export deals and operational recoveries.
- WDS exhibits higher recent momentum in stock comparison metrics within the energy sector.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits CNQ, a leading North American integrated oil and gas producer, against WDS, an Australian-based liquefied natural gas (LNG) heavyweight with global operations. Both companies navigate volatile energy markets influenced by geopolitical tensions, supply dynamics, and demand shifts. Investors seeking exposure to oil and gas E&P, dividend payers, or growth in LNG may find value in evaluating their relative performance, valuations, and recent market positioning. This analysis highlights key contrasts for informed trading and portfolio decisions in the current environment.
CNQ Overview and Recent Performance
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) is a major player in crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGLs) production, primarily in Western Canada, the U.K. North Sea, and Offshore Africa. Its integrated operations include synthetic crude oil and midstream pipelines. In recent market activity, CNQ shares have reflected resilience amid sector pressures, with strong long-term gains—such as 280% over five years—bolstered by a Q4 profit beat that exceeded expectations. Sentiment has been supported by analyst price target upgrades, though recent weeks saw some pullback from 52-week highs, influenced by broader oil price fluctuations and production concerns. Trading at a forward P/E of 12.67 and beta of 0.93 (measuring market volatility), CNQ appeals to value-oriented investors.
WDS Overview and Recent Performance
Woodside Energy Group Limited (WDS) focuses on hydrocarbons exploration, production, and marketing, with key assets in LNG projects like Pluto, North West Shelf, and Wheatstone in Australia and beyond. Recent developments include securing additional LNG export rights, resuming North West Shelf operations post-cyclone, and assuming control of a Texas ammonia facility, signaling expansion into lower-carbon opportunities. Shares have surged in recent weeks, driven by these catalysts and robust LNG demand, achieving YTD gains of 52% and trading near 52-week highs. With a dividend yield of 4.86% and an unusually low beta of -0.25, WDS demonstrates momentum amid energy transition themes.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots, suited to current market conditions, employ diverse AI/ML strategies on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, targeting sectors like energy, semiconductors, and industrials. Performance stats are compelling: annualized returns range from +15% to +168%, win rates 48%–88%, and profit factors 1.5–11.7, with features like take-profit/stop-loss corridors for risk management. Examples include energy-focused trend traders and volatility plays. Traders can copy these high performers in real-time—explore the page to match bots to your style and conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CNQ emphasizes North American oil sands and conventional production for steady cash flows, contrasting WDS's global LNG dominance, which positions it for Asian demand growth amid energy transitions. Valuation favors CNQ with lower P/E multiples, while WDS leads in momentum and YTD relative performance. Risk profiles differ: CNQ's higher beta signals oil price sensitivity, versus WDS's lower volatility. Sector exposure overlaps in E&P but diverges in LNG versus upstream oil. Market sentiment tilts toward WDS on operational wins, while CNQ benefits from earnings strength—trade-offs hinge on growth versus value preferences.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward WDS with higher probability for near-term upside, based on superior trend consistency, YTD outperformance, and fresh LNG catalysts amid favorable energy market positioning. CNQ remains compelling for stability and valuation, but WDS's momentum edges it in observable factors.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNQ is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WDS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -6.81% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -8.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -7.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
WDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-7.50% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| CNQ | WDS | CNQ / WDS | |
| Capitalization | 89.1B | 38.9B | 229% |
| EBITDA | 17.5B | 9.35B | 187% |
| Gain YTD | 25.318 | 32.503 | 78% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.80 | 14.15 | 83% |
| Revenue | 44.5B | 13B | 342% |
| Total Cash | 113M | 5.94B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 17.3B | 13.7B | 126% |
CNQ | WDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WDS's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNQ (54) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNQ’s over the last 12 months.
CNQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (53) in the null industry. This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
CNQ's SMR Rating (53) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (83) in the null industry. This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
CNQ's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (51) in the null industry. This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNQ (53) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNQ’s over the last 12 months.
| CNQ | WDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 66% | 8 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 13 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
WDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.