| EFG | PCIG | EFG / PCIG | |
| Gain YTD | 15.938 | -2.618 | -609% |
| Net Assets | 9.32B | 24.7M | 37,733% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 23.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 1.53 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 2 years | - |
| EFG | PCIG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCIG and ICLR have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCIG and ICLR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCIG | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| ICLR - PCIG | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
| SU - PCIG | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| MDT - PCIG | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| HDB - PCIG | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
| SAP - PCIG | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
More | ||||