| EFG | PCIG | EFG / PCIG | |
| Gain YTD | 6.605 | -4.992 | -132% |
| Net Assets | 16.7B | 24.7M | 67,611% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 23.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 2.24 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
| EFG | PCIG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 15 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCIG has been loosely correlated with NU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PCIG jumps, then NU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCIG | 100% | -1.10% | ||
| NU - PCIG | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| ONON - PCIG | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| MNDY - PCIG | 10% Poorly correlated | +5.30% | ||
| DSY - PCIG | 9% Poorly correlated | -5.08% | ||
| WTW - PCIG | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
More | ||||