EFSC
Price
$64.46
Change
+$1.19 (+1.88%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.31B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$54.88
Change
+$0.92 (+1.70%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
932.13M
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs MBWM

EFSC vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. MBWM commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Buy and MBWM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (EFSC: $63.27 vs. MBWM: $53.96)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 108% vs. MBWM: 87%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.31B vs. MBWM: $932.13M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.31B. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $932.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than EFSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.79% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.73% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.32B) has a higher market cap than MBWM($932M). EFSC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: EFSC (11.94) vs MBWM (9.67). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 18.514 vs. MBWM (13.876). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 259M vs. MBWM (48.4M). EFSC has less debt than MBWM: EFSC (413M) vs MBWM (484M). EFSC has higher revenues than MBWM: EFSC (634M) vs MBWM (253M).
EFSCMBWMEFSC / MBWM
Capitalization2.32B932M248%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.51413.876133%
P/E Ratio11.949.67123%
Revenue634M253M251%
Total Cash259M48.4M535%
Total Debt413M484M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3935
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5021
SMR RATING
1..100
3546
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (52). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (50). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (46). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (47). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (48). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROPE29.520.19
+0.66%
Coastal Compass 100 ETF
EBI64.960.08
+0.12%
The RBB Fund Trust Longview Advantage ETF
IBIJ25.92-0.13
-0.50%
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term Tips ETF
RMM14.50-0.09
-0.62%
RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund
PDO12.86-0.11
-0.85%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+1.87%
FRME - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
BUSE - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
THFF - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
MBWM - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
CATY - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
More

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
+0.39%
SRCE - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
THFF - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
IBCP - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
FRME - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
EFSC - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
More