Advertisement
EFSC vs MBWM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and MBWM is a Hold.
| EFSC | MBWM | EFSC / MBWM | |
| Capitalization | 2.23B | 1.04B | 215% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.021 | 27.512 | 58% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.25 | 10.55 | 116% |
| Revenue | 643M | 261M | 246% |
| Total Cash | 259M | 48.4M | 535% |
| Total Debt | 682M | 472M | 144% |
EFSC | MBWM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MBWM's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (49). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSC (46). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (26). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.
MBWM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (50). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (33). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
| EFSC | MBWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 10 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 44% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MBWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MBWM’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.42% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-1.03% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GAB | 5.41 | 0.04 | +0.74% |
| Gabelli Equity Trust (The) | |||
| TRIO | 65.75 | 0.40 | +0.61% |
| MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) | |||
| DUG | 14.42 | 0.06 | +0.42% |
| ProShares UltraShort Energy (DUG) | |||
| GMAR | 45.11 | N/A | +0.01% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) | |||
| USIN | 47.78 | -0.23 | -0.48% |
| WisdomTree 7-10 Year Laddered Treasury Fund (USIN) | |||
EFSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSC | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| BUSE - EFSC | 86% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| FRME - EFSC | 86% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| BY - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| THFF - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| SRCE - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
More | ||||
MBWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBWM | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| THFF - MBWM | 85% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| PRK - MBWM | 85% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| SRCE - MBWM | 85% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| TMP - MBWM | 84% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| EFSC - MBWM | 84% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
More | ||||