EFSC
Price
$60.12
Change
+$0.62 (+1.04%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.18B
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSBI
Price
$33.15
Change
+$0.41 (+1.25%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
688.35M
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs MSBI

EFSC vs MSBI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. MSBI commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and MSBI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs MSBI: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
MSBI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6285
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4739
SMR RATING
1..100
1529
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3236
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSBI's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (49). This means that MSBI’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

MSBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (47). This means that MSBI’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MSBI (29). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MSBI’s over the last 12 months.

MSBI's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (56). This means that MSBI’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MSBI (36). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MSBI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCMSBI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (EFSC: $59.50 vs. MSBI: $32.74)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and MSBI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 83% vs. MSBI: 76%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.18B vs. MSBI: $688.35M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.18B. MSBI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $688.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MSBI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSBI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSBI is a better buy in the long-term than EFSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSBI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSBI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than MSBI.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.96% price change this week, while MSBI (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

MSBI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSBI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KF66.661.00
+1.52%
Korea Fund
DVQQ33.360.08
+0.25%
WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ)
IIGD23.830.05
+0.22%
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD)
DBA28.13-0.01
-0.04%
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA)
EXUS27.83-0.19
-0.67%
Nomura ETF Trust Nomura Focused International Core ETF (EXUS)

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+0.93%
BUSE - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
FRME - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
BY - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
THFF - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
SRCE - EFSC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
More

MSBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSBI has been closely correlated with IBCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSBI jumps, then IBCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSBI
1D Price
Change %
MSBI100%
+1.80%
IBCP - MSBI
71%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
EFSC - MSBI
71%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
UVSP - MSBI
71%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
BY - MSBI
70%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
QCRH - MSBI
70%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
More