EFSC
Price
$54.58
Change
+$0.26 (+0.48%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.02B
79 days until earnings call
NIC
Price
$126.36
Change
+$1.05 (+0.84%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.88B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs NIC

Header iconEFSC vs NIC Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs NICBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$54.58
Change+$0.26 (+0.48%)
Volume$71.93K
Capitalization2.02B
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$126.36
Change+$1.05 (+0.84%)
Volume$38.18K
Capitalization1.88B
EFSC vs NIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. NIC commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and NIC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $54.64 vs. NIC: $126.36)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 39% vs. NIC: 44%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.02B vs. NIC: $1.88B
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.02B. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIC is a better buy in the long-term than EFSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIC is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

NIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.02B) has a higher market cap than NIC($1.88B). NIC has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: NIC (14.47) vs EFSC (10.39). NIC YTD gains are higher at: 21.053 vs. EFSC (-2.042). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. NIC (105M). NIC has less debt than EFSC: NIC (134M) vs EFSC (661M). EFSC has higher revenues than NIC: EFSC (552M) vs NIC (367M).
EFSCNICEFSC / NIC
Capitalization2.02B1.88B108%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.04221.053-10%
P/E Ratio10.3914.4772%
Revenue552M367M150%
Total Cash260M105M248%
Total Debt661M134M493%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3123
SMR RATING
1..100
1521
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5435
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a26

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSC's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (70). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (31). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (21). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (59). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (54). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCNIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNPIX44.30N/A
N/A
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Inv
MCFOX5.54N/A
N/A
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Inv C
LGLQX51.81N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
EQNBX22.55N/A
N/A
MFS Equity Income B
MOWNX19.98N/A
N/A
Moerus Worldwide Value N