Regional and community banks occupy a distinct segment of the U.S. financial sector, often outperforming their larger peers when local economic conditions are favorable and interest rate environments stabilize. This comparison examines two Midwestern banking institutions — EFSC (Enterprise Financial Services Corp) and NIC (Nicolet Bankshares Inc.) — that have both generated compelling returns for shareholders in recent periods. While EFSC operates a broader multi-state footprint from its St. Louis-area headquarters, NIC has built a concentrated Upper Midwest franchise anchored in Wisconsin. Investors evaluating regional bank exposure may find this side-by-side analysis useful for understanding how these two institutions compare across growth trajectories, profitability metrics, risk profiles, and market sentiment.
Enterprise Financial Services Corp, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri, operates through its subsidiary Enterprise Bank & Trust, offering commercial lending, specialized banking services, and wealth management to businesses and individuals across Arizona, California, Florida, Kansas, Missouri, Nevada, and New Mexico. The bank has carved out niches in SBA (Small Business Administration) lending, life insurance premium finance, sponsor finance, and tax credit-related lending — areas where its specialized expertise provides competitive differentiation.
In recent quarters, EFSC has demonstrated steady balance sheet expansion. The company closed a 12-branch acquisition that added approximately $610 million in deposits and $292 million in loans, strengthening its presence in Arizona and Kansas City. For full-year 2025, the company reported diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $5.31, with the fourth quarter delivering $1.45 per share — beating consensus estimates by roughly 13%. The net interest margin (NIM), a key profitability measure for banks that reflects the difference between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits, reached 4.26% in the most recent quarter, reflecting effective management of funding costs amid a shifting rate environment. Deposits grew to $14.6 billion, and the loan-to-deposit ratio stood at approximately 81%, indicating ample liquidity. Return on average assets (ROAA) was 1.27% and return on average tangible common equity (ROATCE) reached 14.02%. The company's tangible book value per share has expanded meaningfully over the past year, a positive signal for value-oriented investors.
Sentiment around EFSC has been supported by consistent earnings beats, a rising dividend (most recently set at $0.33 per share quarterly), and disciplined capital management. However, credit quality has drawn some attention, with nonperforming loans ticking higher in recent quarters — primarily tied to isolated commercial real estate exposures. The stock's beta of 0.80 indicates relatively moderate volatility compared to the broader market.
Nicolet Bankshares Inc., based in Green Bay, Wisconsin, is the holding company for Nicolet National Bank, a full-service community bank serving businesses and individuals primarily in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota. Founded in 2000, the bank provides a broad suite of services including commercial and agricultural lending, consumer banking, wealth management, and retirement plan services. Its community-focused model emphasizes deep client relationships and local market knowledge.
NIC has posted exceptional financial results in recent periods. Full-year 2025 delivered record net income of $151 million, representing a 21.5% increase in diluted EPS to $9.78 compared to the prior year. The company achieved a ROAA of 1.68% and a ROATCE of 18.53% — metrics that place it among the higher-performing community banks nationally. The net interest margin expanded by 29 basis points (a basis point equals one-hundredth of a percentage point) year-over-year to 3.76%, driven by higher asset yields and disciplined deposit cost management. Core deposit growth of $497 million (7% year-over-year) underscored the strength of the bank's customer franchise, while loan growth of $210 million (3%) remained measured but steady.
Market sentiment has been notably bullish, with NIC shares advancing approximately 40% year-to-date through late July 2026. The company has also been actively returning capital to shareholders through share repurchases and a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. CEO Mike Daniels has highlighted the upcoming integration of MidWestOne customers and employees as a growth catalyst for 2026. With a beta of 0.65, NIC exhibits even lower market sensitivity than EFSC. The stock's 52-week range spans from approximately $114 to over $173, reflecting both the magnitude of its rally and the confidence investors have placed in its execution.
For traders seeking data-driven decision-making tools, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate varying market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, each with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics. Some bots focus on short-term momentum trades, while others employ swing trading or longer-term trend-following approaches. The Trending AI Robots section highlights only those bots whose recent performance and strategy alignment make them particularly suitable for the current market environment. This dynamic curation helps users cut through the noise and identify bots that have demonstrated consistent execution amid prevailing conditions. Whether you are interested in regional bank stocks like EFSC and NIC or broader market opportunities, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can provide actionable insights grounded in algorithmic analysis.
While both EFSC and NIC are well-regarded regional banking franchises, their profiles diverge in several meaningful ways. EFSC operates a larger balance sheet with $14.6 billion in deposits and a more geographically diversified footprint spanning seven states, including Sunbelt markets like Arizona and Florida that offer faster demographic growth tailwinds. Its specialized lending niches — particularly SBA lending and life insurance premium finance — provide differentiated fee income streams that partially insulate earnings from pure rate-cycle sensitivity.
NIC, by contrast, runs a more concentrated franchise in the Upper Midwest with deeper community banking roots. Its profitability metrics stand out: a ROAA of 1.68% and ROATCE above 18% substantially exceed EFSC's comparable figures, reflecting superior operating efficiency and capital allocation. However, NIC trades at a significantly higher earnings multiple — approximately 19x trailing EPS versus roughly 12x for EFSC — indicating that the market has already priced in much of NIC's operational excellence. On the risk side, EFSC carries modestly elevated credit concerns related to commercial real estate exposure, while NIC's smaller agricultural loan book introduces a different set of localized economic sensitivities. Both banks maintain strong capital ratios, with Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) levels comfortably above regulatory requirements.
Based on observable market data and trend characteristics, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor NIC in the current environment, though with important caveats. NIC exhibits stronger trend consistency: its year-to-date price momentum of approximately 40%, higher profitability ratios, record earnings trajectory, and expanding net interest margin collectively suggest more powerful positive price dynamics. The stock has also demonstrated resilience, with relatively low beta and sustained institutional interest. That said, the richer valuation multiple of NIC compared to EFSC introduces a potential mean-reversion risk that momentum-oriented algorithms would monitor. EFSC, with its lower P/E ratio, stronger NIM, and diversified geographic footprint, presents a more value-oriented opportunity that may appeal to bots employing contrarian or value-factor strategies. Ultimately, AI-driven selection between these two names would depend on the specific bot's strategy mandate — trend-following models would likely lean toward NIC, while value-oriented algorithms might find EFSC the more compelling candidate.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EFSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.94%.
EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
NIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| EFSC | NIC | EFSC / NIC | |
| Capitalization | 2.41B | 3.73B | 64% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.473 | 47.563 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.21 | 19.97 | 66% |
| Revenue | 643M | 519M | 124% |
| Total Cash | 259M | 123M | 211% |
| Total Debt | 682M | 92.8M | 735% |
EFSC | NIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EFSC's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIC (89). This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIC’s over the last 12 months.
NIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (38). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
EFSC's SMR Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (45). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.
NIC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (48). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
NIC's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (28). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
| EFSC | NIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 62% | 8 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 43% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NFLP | 19.25 | 1.23 | +6.83% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Netflix ETF | |||
| XYZY | 26.19 | 1.17 | +4.70% |
| YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| SPYU | 37.49 | 0.96 | +2.63% |
| MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | |||
| DSI | 148.36 | 1.08 | +0.73% |
| iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF | |||
| MMTM | 310.41 | 1.74 | +0.56% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® 1500MomtTiltETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSC | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| FRME - EFSC | 87% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| BUSE - EFSC | 87% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| THFF - EFSC | 86% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| TRMK - EFSC | 86% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| BY - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIC has been closely correlated with WSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIC jumps, then WSBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIC | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| WSBC - NIC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CTBI - NIC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| EFSC - NIC | 75% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| BUSE - NIC | 75% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| MBWM - NIC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||