EFSC
Price
$64.65
Change
+$1.38 (+2.18%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.37B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NPB
Price
$18.16
Change
+$0.27 (+1.51%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
628.01M
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs NPB

EFSC vs NPB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. NPB commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Buy and NPB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (EFSC: $63.27 vs. NPB: $17.89)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and NPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 108% vs. NPB: 66%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.31B vs. NPB: $618.67M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.31B. NPB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $618.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than NPB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NPB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NPB is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.79% price change this week, while NPB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

NPB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.37B) has a higher market cap than NPB($628M). EFSC has higher P/E ratio than NPB: EFSC (11.94) vs NPB (7.99). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 18.514 vs. NPB (6.905). EFSC has less debt than NPB: EFSC (413M) vs NPB (1.75B). EFSC has higher revenues than NPB: EFSC (634M) vs NPB (252M).
EFSCNPBEFSC / NPB
Capitalization2.37B628M377%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.5146.905268%
P/E Ratio11.947.99149%
Revenue634M252M252%
Total Cash259MN/A-
Total Debt413M1.75B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
35
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCNPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NPB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROPE29.520.19
+0.66%
Coastal Compass 100 ETF
EBI64.960.08
+0.12%
The RBB Fund Trust Longview Advantage ETF
IBIJ25.92-0.13
-0.50%
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term Tips ETF
RMM14.50-0.09
-0.62%
RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund
PDO12.86-0.11
-0.85%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+1.87%
FRME - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
BUSE - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
THFF - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
MBWM - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
CATY - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
More

NPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPB has been loosely correlated with SMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPB jumps, then SMBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPB
1D Price
Change %
NPB100%
+0.22%
SMBK - NPB
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
IBCP - NPB
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
UVSP - NPB
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
FRME - NPB
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
EFSC - NPB
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
More