EFSH vs TUSK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSH is a Hold and TUSK is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EFSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TUSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EFSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TUSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
| EFSH | TUSK | EFSH / TUSK | |
| Capitalization | 5.62M | 177M | 3% |
| EBITDA | -272.45K | 67M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -72.143 | -35.000 | 206% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 23.38 | - |
| Revenue | 63.1M | 309M | 20% |
| Total Cash | 2.34M | 16.6M | 14% |
| Total Debt | 37.8M | 63.3M | 60% |
EFSH | TUSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EFSH's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TUSK (67) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFSH’s stock grew significantly faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFSH (100) in the null industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew similarly to EFSH’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's SMR Rating (95) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFSH (99) in the null industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew similarly to EFSH’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSH (98) in the null industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSH’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFSH (100) in the null industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew significantly faster than EFSH’s over the last 12 months.
| EFSH | TUSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
EFSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFSH and MDU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFSH and MDU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSH | 100% | N/A | ||
| MDU - EFSH | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| TUSK - EFSH | 21% Poorly correlated | -5.34% | ||
| CODI - EFSH | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.59% | ||
| ATI - EFSH | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.69% | ||
| IIIN - EFSH | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.98% | ||
More | ||||
TUSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TUSK has been loosely correlated with CRESY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TUSK jumps, then CRESY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TUSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | 100% | -5.34% | ||
| CRESY - TUSK | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| MLI - TUSK | 37% Loosely correlated | -4.11% | ||
| TRC - TUSK | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| IIIN - TUSK | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.98% | ||
| MEC - TUSK | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.33% | ||
More | ||||