The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MEC turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where MEC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 40 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MEC's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 18 of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 28, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MEC as a result. In 72 of 99 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Following a +9.02% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MEC advanced for three days, in 226 of 306 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
MEC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for MEC moved below the 200-day moving average on September 24, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MEC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The Aroon Indicator for MEC entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 8 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.177) is normal, around the industry mean (3.033). MEC has a moderately low P/E Ratio (-18.096) as compared to the industry average of (8.852). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.200) is also within normal values, averaging (0.744). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.029) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.621) is also within normal values, averaging (6248.204).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. MEC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MEC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock worse than average.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TUSK turned positive on October 26, 2026. Looking at past instances where TUSK's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 40 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 27, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TUSK as a result. In 83 of 103 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
TUSK moved above its 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +12.77% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TUSK advanced for three days, in 193 of 245 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 10-day moving average for TUSK crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 29, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TUSK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
TUSK broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for TUSK entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 24 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. TUSK’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 96 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.583) is normal, around the industry mean (-1.275). TUSK's P/E Ratio (318.000) is considerably higher than the industry average of (18.445). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.030) is also within normal values, averaging (0.772). Dividend Yield (0.157) settles around the average of (742.665) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.140) is also within normal values, averaging (2.059).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TUSK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
MEC | TUSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MEC's Valuation (8) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for TUSK (96) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MEC’s stock grew significantly faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as MEC (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew similarly to MEC’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's SMR Rating (90) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as MEC (92) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew similarly to MEC’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as MEC (64) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew similarly to MEC’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for MEC (98) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew significantly faster than MEC’s over the last 12 months.
| MEC | TUSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MEC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TUSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MEC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TUSK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MEC (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +18.17% price change this week, while TUSK (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was +19.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.84%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.74%.
MEC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.17% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEC has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEC jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TUSK has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TUSK jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TUSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | 100% | +9.28% | ||
| MLI - TUSK | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
| IIIN - TUSK | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
| MEC - TUSK | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| ATI - TUSK | 30% Poorly correlated | -5.38% | ||
| PRLB - TUSK | 27% Poorly correlated | -11.27% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BNDP | 72.21 | 0.15 | +0.21% |
| Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) | |||
| AMUB | 22.65 | 0.04 | +0.20% |
| ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) | |||
| CBOY | 25.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY) | |||
| PSC | 68.37 | -1.16 | -1.67% |
| Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF (PSC) | |||
| NUEM | 38.47 | -1.06 | -2.68% |
| Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) | |||