| EFV | ICOW | EFV / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 32.755 | 31.586 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 26.9B | 1.35B | 1,993% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.65 | 51% |
| Turnover | 3.90 | 79.00 | 5% |
| Yield | 3.32 | 2.03 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 8 years | - |
| EFV | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFV has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFV jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| SHEL - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| MT - ICOW | 69% Closely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 66% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| TS - ICOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||