| EFV | INEQ | EFV / INEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 18.213 | 15.034 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 31.7B | 105M | 30,190% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.45 | 69% |
| Turnover | 3.90 | 139.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 4.52 | 2.68 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| EFV | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFV has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFV jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that INEQ and AMP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INEQ and AMP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INEQ | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| AMP - INEQ | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
| SHEL - INEQ | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| CON - INEQ | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| MRK - INEQ | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.39% | ||
| EBS - INEQ | 12% Poorly correlated | +5.39% | ||
More | ||||