EFXT
Price
$11.27
Change
+$0.29 (+2.64%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.38B
31 days until earnings call
NOA
Price
$14.34
Change
-$0.20 (-1.38%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
417.16M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFXT vs NOA

Header iconEFXT vs NOA Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs NOABanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$11.27
Change+$0.29 (+2.64%)
Volume$521.96K
Capitalization1.38B
North American Construction Group
Price$14.34
Change-$0.20 (-1.38%)
Volume$78.05K
Capitalization417.16M
EFXT vs NOA Comparison Chart in %
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. NOA commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a Hold and NOA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EFXT: $11.27 vs. NOA: $14.34)
Brand notoriety: EFXT and NOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 113% vs. NOA: 55%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $1.38B vs. NOA: $417.16M
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.38B. NOA’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $417.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $51.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFXT is a better buy in the long-term than NOA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOA is a better buy in the short-term than EFXT.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +2.55% price change this week, while NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +3.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

NOA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.86% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFXT($1.38B) has a higher market cap than NOA($417M). NOA has higher P/E ratio than EFXT: NOA (17.01) vs EFXT (10.56). EFXT YTD gains are higher at: 13.266 vs. NOA (-33.642). EFXT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 458M vs. NOA (296M). NOA has more cash in the bank: 79M vs. EFXT (74M). EFXT has less debt than NOA: EFXT (753M) vs NOA (884M). EFXT has higher revenues than NOA: EFXT (2.33B) vs NOA (1.25B).
EFXTNOAEFXT / NOA
Capitalization1.38B417M330%
EBITDA458M296M155%
Gain YTD13.266-33.642-39%
P/E Ratio10.5617.0162%
Revenue2.33B1.25B186%
Total Cash74M79M94%
Total Debt753M884M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs NOA: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
NOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3362
SMR RATING
1..100
6377
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOA's Valuation (39) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFXT (45) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (62) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (77) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (61) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFXT (98) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew significantly faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTNOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTSIX39.760.13
+0.33%
FullerThaler Behvrl S-M Cor Eq Instl
AWACX25.210.06
+0.24%
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy C
JCNAX30.970.05
+0.16%
Janus Henderson Contrarian A
JPDVX17.070.02
+0.12%
JPMorgan Diversified L
POGSX91.90-0.24
-0.26%
Pin Oak Equity

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with PUMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then PUMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
+2.64%
PUMP - EFXT
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
BKR - EFXT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
WHD - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
OII - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
VTOL - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with EFXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then EFXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
-1.38%
EFXT - NOA
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
WFRD - NOA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
VAL - NOA
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.73%
OII - NOA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
HLX - NOA
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.73%
More