EFXT
Price
$9.87
Change
+$0.15 (+1.54%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.2B
75 days until earnings call
NOA
Price
$13.56
Change
+$0.25 (+1.88%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
394.36M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFXT vs NOA

Header iconEFXT vs NOA Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs NOABanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$9.87
Change+$0.15 (+1.54%)
Volume$561.87K
Capitalization1.2B
North American Construction Group
Price$13.56
Change+$0.25 (+1.88%)
Volume$177.28K
Capitalization394.36M
EFXT vs NOA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. NOA commentary
Aug 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a Buy and NOA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2025
Stock price -- (EFXT: $9.87 vs. NOA: $13.56)
Brand notoriety: EFXT and NOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 87% vs. NOA: 143%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $1.2B vs. NOA: $394.36M
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.2B. NOA’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $394.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNOA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NOA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFXT is a better buy in the long-term than NOA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NOA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFXT is a better buy in the short-term than NOA.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +2.92% price change this week, while NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +10.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

NOA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFXT($1.2B) has a higher market cap than NOA($394M). NOA has higher P/E ratio than EFXT: NOA (15.81) vs EFXT (9.49). EFXT YTD gains are higher at: -0.804 vs. NOA (-37.251). EFXT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 458M vs. NOA (296M). NOA has more cash in the bank: 79M vs. EFXT (74M). EFXT has less debt than NOA: EFXT (753M) vs NOA (884M). EFXT has higher revenues than NOA: EFXT (2.33B) vs NOA (1.25B).
EFXTNOAEFXT / NOA
Capitalization1.2B394M305%
EBITDA458M296M155%
Gain YTD-0.804-37.2512%
P/E Ratio9.4915.8160%
Revenue2.33B1.25B186%
Total Cash74M79M94%
Total Debt753M884M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs NOA: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
NOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
278
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3861
SMR RATING
1..100
6376
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3986
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9835
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFXT's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (45) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (61) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (76) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOA (86) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOA’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFXT (98) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTNOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCTBY16.000.49
+3.19%
Securitas A B
SVFAX79.13N/A
N/A
Smead Value A
PFFVF177.85N/A
N/A
Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG
SYYYF1.80N/A
N/A
Synthomer PLC
NGPHF0.11-0.01
-8.19%
Northern Graphite Corp.

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with BKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then BKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
+1.54%
BKR - EFXT
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
PUMP - EFXT
62%
Loosely correlated
+6.96%
OII - EFXT
61%
Loosely correlated
+4.44%
WHD - EFXT
61%
Loosely correlated
+7.41%
LBRT - EFXT
61%
Loosely correlated
+7.34%
More

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
+1.88%
HAL - NOA
54%
Loosely correlated
+4.65%
SLB - NOA
53%
Loosely correlated
+5.32%
FTI - NOA
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
HLX - NOA
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.33%
EFXT - NOA
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
More