Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGFFX vs RGACX
EGFFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EGFFX vs RGACX
EGFFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGFFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGFFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. EGFFX (1.8B). EGFFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EGFFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EGFFX (20 years) vs RGACX (24 years). EGFFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). EGFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGFFX: RGACX (250) vs EGFFX (3000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. EGFFX (-99.75). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. EGFFX (-99.82).
| EGFFX | RGACX | EGFFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.93 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.93 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -99.611 | 6.959 | -1,431% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -99.75 | 3.68 | -2,711% |
| Returns for 3 years | -99.72 | 37.13 | -269% |
| Returns for 5 years | -99.82 | 13.46 | -742% |
| Returns for 10 years | -99.51 | 97.58 | -102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement