Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGFIX vs RGACX
EGFIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EGFIX vs RGACX
EGFIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGFIX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGFIX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. EGFIX (1.33B). EGFIX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EGFIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EGFIX (21 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than EGFIX (0.87). EGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGFIX: RGACX (250) vs EGFIX (100000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. EGFIX (-90.71). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. EGFIX (-93.53).
| EGFIX | RGACX | EGFIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.93 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -86.336 | 8.819 | -979% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -90.71 | -0.53 | 17,080% |
| Returns for 3 years | -89.19 | 40.68 | -219% |
| Returns for 5 years | -93.53 | 10.82 | -864% |
| Returns for 10 years | -80.87 | 101.31 | -80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers