EHMEF
Price
$146.96
Change
-$0.49 (-0.33%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.44B
RM
Price
$42.36
Change
+$0.88 (+2.12%)
Updated
Aug 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
406.47M
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EHMEF vs RM

Header iconEHMEF vs RM Comparison
Open Charts EHMEF vs RMBanner chart's image
GOEASY
Price$146.96
Change-$0.49 (-0.33%)
Volume$11.78K
Capitalization2.44B
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$42.36
Change+$0.88 (+2.12%)
Volume$300
Capitalization406.47M
EHMEF vs RM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EHMEF vs. RM commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHMEF is a Hold and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EHMEF: $146.96 vs. RM: $41.48)
Brand notoriety: EHMEF and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EHMEF: 4% vs. RM: 130%
Market capitalization -- EHMEF: $2.44B vs. RM: $406.47M
EHMEF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.44B. RM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $406.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EHMEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EHMEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EHMEF is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EHMEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EHMEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than EHMEF.

Price Growth

EHMEF (@Savings Banks) experienced а -0.33% price change this week, while RM (@Savings Banks) price change was +9.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

RM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+3.54% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EHMEF($2.44B) has a higher market cap than RM($406M). EHMEF (12.24) and RM (11.99) have similar P/E ratio . EHMEF YTD gains are higher at: 28.237 vs. RM (25.403). EHMEF has more cash in the bank: 196M vs. RM (4.16M). RM has less debt than EHMEF: RM (1.51B) vs EHMEF (4.14B). EHMEF has higher revenues than RM: EHMEF (1.6B) vs RM (532M).
EHMEFRMEHMEF / RM
Capitalization2.44B406M602%
EBITDA962MN/A-
Gain YTD28.23725.403111%
P/E Ratio12.2411.99102%
Revenue1.6B532M301%
Total Cash196M4.16M4,714%
Total Debt4.14B1.51B273%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EHMEF vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
EHMEF
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4452
SMR RATING
1..100
3817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5056
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (37) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EHMEF (59) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as RM (52) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (17) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EHMEF (38) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EHMEF (42) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as RM (56) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EHMEFRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIDFX9.84N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Value F
FMIEX10.77N/A
N/A
Wasatch Global Value Investor
SVFFX82.36N/A
N/A
Smead Value I1
CATWF0.07N/A
N/A
China Tontine Wines Group Ltd.
RAPIX10.91-0.03
-0.27%
Cohen & Steers Real Assets I

EHMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EHMEF and WSC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHMEF and WSC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHMEF
1D Price
Change %
EHMEF100%
N/A
WSC - EHMEF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
RM - EHMEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
UHAL - EHMEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
MIUFY - EHMEF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMF - EHMEF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More