EHMEF
Price
$124.69
Change
+$10.30 (+9.00%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.59B
RM
Price
$33.32
Change
+$0.29 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
236.25M
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EHMEF vs RM

Header iconEHMEF vs RM Comparison
Open Charts EHMEF vs RMBanner chart's image
GOEASY
Price$124.69
Change+$10.30 (+9.00%)
Volume$2.91K
Capitalization1.59B
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$33.32
Change+$0.29 (+0.88%)
Volume$500
Capitalization236.25M
EHMEF vs RM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EHMEF vs. RM commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHMEF is a Buy and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (EHMEF: $124.69 vs. RM: $33.30)
Brand notoriety: EHMEF and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EHMEF: 530% vs. RM: 93%
Market capitalization -- EHMEF: $1.59B vs. RM: $236.25M
EHMEF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.59B. RM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $236.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EHMEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EHMEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EHMEF is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EHMEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EHMEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than EHMEF.

Price Growth

EHMEF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +9.00% price change this week, while RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

RM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.43% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EHMEF($1.59B) has a higher market cap than RM($236M). RM has higher P/E ratio than EHMEF: RM (14.49) vs EHMEF (12.79). EHMEF YTD gains are higher at: 8.805 vs. RM (-0.120). EHMEF has more cash in the bank: 41.8M vs. RM (7.41M). RM has less debt than EHMEF: RM (1.43B) vs EHMEF (2.45B). EHMEF has higher revenues than RM: EHMEF (1.07B) vs RM (484M).
EHMEFRMEHMEF / RM
Capitalization1.59B236M672%
EBITDA637MN/A-
Gain YTD8.805-0.120-7,328%
P/E Ratio12.7914.4988%
Revenue1.07B484M222%
Total Cash41.8M7.41M564%
Total Debt2.45B1.43B171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EHMEF vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
EHMEF
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3330
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4864
SMR RATING
1..100
4113
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6472
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EHMEF (30) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as RM (64) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EHMEF (41) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EHMEF (47) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as RM (72) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EHMEFRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OEQAX8.69N/A
N/A
Oaktree Emerging Markets Equity A
VPCCX36.81N/A
N/A
Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Inv
LMPOX33.04N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth R
DGLAX20.96N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Global Stock - A
PRKCX7.50N/A
N/A
PGIM Real Estate Income C

EHMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EHMEF and UWMC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHMEF and UWMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHMEF
1D Price
Change %
EHMEF100%
N/A
UWMC - EHMEF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
PFSI - EHMEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
WSC - EHMEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
RM - EHMEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
RKT - EHMEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
More