EICA
Price
$24.34
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
EICB
Price
$25.01
Change
-$0.08 (-0.32%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EICA vs EICB

Header iconEICA vs EICB Comparison
Open Charts EICA vs EICBBanner chart's image
Eagle Point Income
Price$24.34
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Volume$1.39K
CapitalizationN/A
Eagle Point Income
Price$25.01
Change-$0.08 (-0.32%)
Volume$3.17K
CapitalizationN/A
EICA vs EICB Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICA vs. EICB commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICA is a StrongBuy and EICB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EICA: $24.34 vs. EICB: $25.01)
Brand notoriety: EICA and EICB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICA: 30% vs. EICB: 46%
Market capitalization -- EICA: $0 vs. EICB: $0
EICA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. EICB’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEICB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EICA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EICB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EICA and EICB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

EICA (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while EICB (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

EICA is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.30% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EICA YTD gains are higher at: 4.764 vs. EICB (3.458). EICA (33.1M) and EICB (33.1M) have equivalent revenues.
EICAEICBEICA / EICB
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.7643.458138%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue33.1M33.1M100%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUICX56.66N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI International C
JEMKX10.04N/A
N/A
JHancock Emerging Markets Equity R2
FKIDX16.53N/A
N/A
Fidelity Diversified Intl K6
EEMHX8.78N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research R6
GQFIX12.16N/A
N/A
GQG Partners Global Quality Value Fd Ins

EICA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICA has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EICA jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICA
1D Price
Change %
EICA100%
-0.17%
EICB - EICA
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
OXLCO - EICA
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
CCIA - EICA
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
ECCC - EICA
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
OXLCN - EICA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More

EICB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICB has been closely correlated with OXLCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EICB jumps, then OXLCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICB
1D Price
Change %
EICB100%
-0.32%
OXLCP - EICB
73%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
OCCIN - EICB
69%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
EICA - EICB
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
ECCC - EICB
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
OXLCO - EICB
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
More