EICA
Price
$24.65
Change
+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
OXLCO
Price
$23.32
Change
-$0.07 (-0.30%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EICA vs OXLCO

Header iconEICA vs OXLCO Comparison
Open Charts EICA vs OXLCOBanner chart's image
Eagle Point Income
Price$24.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Volume$1.67K
CapitalizationN/A
Oxford Lane Capital
Price$23.32
Change-$0.07 (-0.30%)
Volume$3.29K
CapitalizationN/A
EICA vs OXLCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICA vs. OXLCO commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICA is a Buy and OXLCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EICA: $24.65 vs. OXLCO: $23.32)
Brand notoriety: EICA and OXLCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICA: 67% vs. OXLCO: 78%
Market capitalization -- EICA: $0 vs. OXLCO: $0
EICA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. OXLCO’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOXLCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EICA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OXLCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OXLCO is a better buy in the long-term than EICA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EICA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXLCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EICA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OXLCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OXLCO is a better buy in the short-term than EICA.

Price Growth

EICA (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while OXLCO (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EICA (7.463) and OXLCO (7.133) have similar YTD gains . OXLCO has more cash in the bank: 27.2M vs. EICA (31.1K). EICA has less debt than OXLCO: EICA (8.49M) vs OXLCO (487M). OXLCO has higher revenues than EICA: OXLCO (57.3M) vs EICA (21.9M).
EICAOXLCOEICA / OXLCO
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.4637.133105%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue21.9M57.3M38%
Total Cash31.1K27.2M0%
Total Debt8.49M487M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OXLCO: Fundamental Ratings
OXLCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EICAOXLCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
4%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
12%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
5%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVIS1.110.01
+0.91%
MicroVision
GMED60.600.31
+0.51%
Globus Medical
ZIONP23.00-0.08
-0.37%
Zions Bancorporation NA
SRCE64.16-0.71
-1.09%
1st Source Corp
SYPR2.08-0.17
-7.56%
Sypris Solutions

EICA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICA has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EICA jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICA
1D Price
Change %
EICA100%
+0.20%
EICB - EICA
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
OXLCO - EICA
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
CCIA - EICA
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
OXLCN - EICA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
PFLT - EICA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

OXLCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXLCO has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXLCO jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXLCO
1D Price
Change %
OXLCO100%
-0.28%
EICB - OXLCO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
OXLCP - OXLCO
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
OCCIN - OXLCO
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
EICA - OXLCO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
CCIA - OXLCO
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
More