Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RMEBX
EIFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$19.74
Change-$0.19 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.47M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
EIFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. EIFVX (232M). EIFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: EIFVX (1.39) vs RMEBX (1.16). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: EIFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.79). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMEBX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. EIFVX (-1.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. EIFVX (39.91).
| EIFVX | RMEBX | EIFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.554 | 5.923 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 232M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.16 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.28 | 8.54 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.64 | 27.89 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.91 | 58.69 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.94 | 68.22 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement