Ad is loading...
EIFVX vs RMEBX
EIFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$18.18
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.13M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
EIFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. EIFVX (234M). EIFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: EIFVX (1.39) vs RMEBX (1.18). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: EIFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.79). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMEBX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. EIFVX (-4.85). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.73 vs. EIFVX (37.51).
| EIFVX | RMEBX | EIFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.312 | -3.381 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 96.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.18 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.85 | 3.48 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.81 | 5.34 | -90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.51 | 47.73 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.66 | 51.61 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...