Ad is loading...
EIFVX vs RMEBX
EIFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$19.27
Change+$0.10 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.61M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
EIFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. EIFVX (220M). EIFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: EIFVX (1.45) vs RMEBX (1.21). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: EIFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.79). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMEBX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. EIFVX (-5.21). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. EIFVX (41.25).
| EIFVX | RMEBX | EIFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.426 | 1.203 | -285% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.21 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.21 | 5.19 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.46 | 16.77 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.25 | 55.02 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.07 | 58.89 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...