EIG
Price
$48.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
62 days until earnings call
HIPO
Price
$22.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
444.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EIG vs HIPO

Header iconEIG vs HIPO Comparison
Open Charts EIG vs HIPOBanner chart's image
Employers Holdings
Price$48.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$132.67K
Capitalization1.13B
Hippo Holdings
Price$22.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization444.16M
EIG vs HIPO Comparison Chart
Loading...
EIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIG vs. HIPO commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIG is a Buy and HIPO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (EIG: $48.66 vs. HIPO: $22.12)
Brand notoriety: EIG and HIPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIG: 74% vs. HIPO: 1%
Market capitalization -- EIG: $1.13B vs. HIPO: $444.16M
EIG [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $1.13B. HIPO’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $444.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EIG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EIG is a better buy in the long-term than HIPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EIG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EIG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HIPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIPO is a better buy in the short-term than EIG.

Price Growth

EIG (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while HIPO (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

EIG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

HIPO is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-1.25% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EIG($1.13B) has a higher market cap than HIPO($444M). EIG has higher P/E ratio than HIPO: EIG (10.06) vs HIPO (0.45). EIG YTD gains are higher at: -3.831 vs. HIPO (-17.370). EIG has more cash in the bank: 913M vs. HIPO (401M). EIG has less debt than HIPO: EIG (5.9M) vs HIPO (14.8M). EIG has higher revenues than HIPO: EIG (851M) vs HIPO (210M).
EIGHIPOEIG / HIPO
Capitalization1.13B444M255%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.831-17.37022%
P/E Ratio10.060.452,217%
Revenue851M210M405%
Total Cash913M401M228%
Total Debt5.9M14.8M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIG: Fundamental Ratings
EIG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EIGHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYWVX69.31N/A
N/A
Rydex Emerging Markets 2X Strategy H
NWZLX18.55N/A
N/A
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
BVALX14.16N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory BeutelGoodmanLg-CpValInst
FHLFX13.79N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series International Index
MKVFX15.48N/A
N/A
MFS International Large Cap Value R3

EIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EIG has been closely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EIG jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIG
1D Price
Change %
EIG100%
N/A
AXS - EIG
68%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
ACT - EIG
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
RDN - EIG
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
ESNT - EIG
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NMIH - EIG
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
N/A
FNF - HIPO
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FAF - HIPO
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TIPT - HIPO
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTG - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EIG - HIPO
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More